Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara

Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.15562/JDMFS.V0I0.829

Ahyar Riza, I. B. Siregar, Rahmi Syaflida, Jeanie T. Tanslie

{"title":"Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara","authors":"Ahyar Riza, I. B. Siregar, Rahmi Syaflida, Jeanie T. Tanslie","doi":"10.15562/JDMFS.V0I0.829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare disinfecting effectiveness of Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments at the Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with post-test only control group design approach. Purposive technique is applied to collect samples which are lower molar extraction forceps. In this study, sample were divided into 2 groups and each consisting of 18instruments soaked in Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3%. Each instrumentwere pre-cleaned using brush, water and soap for both group before going through disinfection process. Results: Statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney Test. The comparison between Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3%showedno significant difference to the total bacteria count on instrument after disinfection (p=0.014 <0.05). Conclusion: Glutaraldehyde 2% showed more effective than Hydrogen Peroxide 3% in disinfecting lower molar extraction forceps. Keyword: Disinfection, Forceps, Glutaraldehyde, Hydrogen peroxide Cite this Article: Riza A, Siregar IB, Syaflida R, Tanslie JT. 2020. Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 5(3): 150-153. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v5i3.829 Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara Ahyar Riza,* Indra B. Siregar, Rahmi Syaflida, Jeanie T. Tanslie","PeriodicalId":31119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science","volume":"108 1","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15562/JDMFS.V0I0.829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare disinfecting effectiveness of Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments at the Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with post-test only control group design approach. Purposive technique is applied to collect samples which are lower molar extraction forceps. In this study, sample were divided into 2 groups and each consisting of 18instruments soaked in Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3%. Each instrumentwere pre-cleaned using brush, water and soap for both group before going through disinfection process. Results: Statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney Test. The comparison between Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3%showedno significant difference to the total bacteria count on instrument after disinfection (p=0.014 <0.05). Conclusion: Glutaraldehyde 2% showed more effective than Hydrogen Peroxide 3% in disinfecting lower molar extraction forceps. Keyword: Disinfection, Forceps, Glutaraldehyde, Hydrogen peroxide Cite this Article: Riza A, Siregar IB, Syaflida R, Tanslie JT. 2020. Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 5(3): 150-153. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v5i3.829 Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara Ahyar Riza,* Indra B. Siregar, Rahmi Syaflida, Jeanie T. Tanslie

查看原文本刊更多论文

2%戊二醛与3%过氧化氢对拔牙器械消毒效果的比较苏门答腊大学牙科学院口腔颌面外科

目的:比较2%戊二醛和3%过氧化氢对北苏门答腊大学口腔外科口腔外科拔牙器械的消毒效果。材料与方法:本研究为实验研究，采用后验对照组设计方法。采用目的技术，采用下磨牙拔牙钳采集标本。本研究将样品分为2组，每组18台仪器分别浸泡在2%戊二醛和3%过氧化氢溶液中。两组仪器均使用毛刷、水和肥皂进行预清洁，然后进行消毒。结果:采用Mann-Whitney检验进行统计学分析。2%戊二醛与3%过氧化氢消毒后仪器细菌总数比较，差异无统计学意义(p=0.014 <0.05)。结论:2%戊二醛对下磨牙拔牙钳的消毒效果优于3%过氧化氢。关键词:消毒，镊子，戊二醛，过氧化氢本文引用:Riza A, Siregar IB, Syaflida R, Tanslie JT。2020. 2%戊二醛与3%过氧化氢对拔牙器械消毒效果的比较苏门答腊大学牙科学院口腔颌面外科牙颌面科学杂志5(3):150-153。DOI: 10.15562/jdmf .v5i3.829 2%和3%过氧化氢对拔牙器械消毒效果的比较，sumatra Utara大学牙科学院口腔外科颌面科，Ahyar Riza，* Indra B. Siregar, Rahmi Syaflida, Jeanie T. Tanslie

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊