{"title":"Comparison between circular and square loops for low-frequency magnetic resonance applications: theoretical performance estimation","authors":"Giulio Giovannetti","doi":"10.1002/cmr.b.21343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Radiofrequency receiver coils in magnetic resonance (MR) systems are used to pick up the signals emitted by the nuclei with high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in a small region of sensitivity. The quality of obtained images strongly depends upon the correct choice of the coils geometry and size. The simplest design of such coils is circular and square loops, both producing in the central region-of-interest a magnetic field perpendicular to the coil plane, with an amplitude that decreases along the coil axis. This work reviews a method for coil SNR model development employing an equivalent electric circuit and applies it for circular and square loop design. Coil inductance and resistance were analitically calculated by taking into account for the conductors cross-geometry and the magnetic field pattern was estimated using Biot–Savart law, while the sample-induced resistance was calculated with a method employing a quasi-static approach. Coil performance prediction permitted to compare circular and square loops and demonstrated that when a simple relationship between loops size is satisfied, the performance of both coils resulted to be very similar in terms of SNR. Since the theoretical approach formulation is largely detailed, this article could be interesting for graduate students and researchers working in the field of MR coil design and development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50623,"journal":{"name":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering","volume":"46B 3","pages":"146-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cmr.b.21343","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cmr.b.21343","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
Abstract
Radiofrequency receiver coils in magnetic resonance (MR) systems are used to pick up the signals emitted by the nuclei with high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in a small region of sensitivity. The quality of obtained images strongly depends upon the correct choice of the coils geometry and size. The simplest design of such coils is circular and square loops, both producing in the central region-of-interest a magnetic field perpendicular to the coil plane, with an amplitude that decreases along the coil axis. This work reviews a method for coil SNR model development employing an equivalent electric circuit and applies it for circular and square loop design. Coil inductance and resistance were analitically calculated by taking into account for the conductors cross-geometry and the magnetic field pattern was estimated using Biot–Savart law, while the sample-induced resistance was calculated with a method employing a quasi-static approach. Coil performance prediction permitted to compare circular and square loops and demonstrated that when a simple relationship between loops size is satisfied, the performance of both coils resulted to be very similar in terms of SNR. Since the theoretical approach formulation is largely detailed, this article could be interesting for graduate students and researchers working in the field of MR coil design and development.
期刊介绍:
Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B brings together engineers and physicists involved in the design and development of hardware and software employed in magnetic resonance techniques. The journal welcomes contributions predominantly from the fields of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), but also encourages submissions relating to less common magnetic resonance imaging and analytical methods.
Contributors come from both academia and industry, to report the latest advancements in the development of instrumentation and computer programming to underpin medical, non-medical, and analytical magnetic resonance techniques.