Penile Compression Release Index Revisited: Evaluation and Comparison with Other Noninvasive Tools in the Prediction of Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Men with Benign Prostatic Enlargement

Damir Aganović, B. Kulovac, S. Bajramović, A. Kešmer
{"title":"Penile Compression Release Index Revisited: Evaluation and Comparison with Other Noninvasive Tools in the Prediction of Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Men with Benign Prostatic Enlargement","authors":"Damir Aganović, B. Kulovac, S. Bajramović, A. Kešmer","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2019.73.81-86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To determine the discriminatory power of penile urethral compression-release index (PCRI), clinical prostate score (CLIPS) and bladder outlet obstruction index 2 (BOON2) for the detection of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), and the associated bladder abnormality in patients with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Material and methods: In study was included of 135 patients with proven BPE underwent urodynamic measurement (UDM) and PCR maneuver. PCR Index was calculated following the formula: (Qs-Qss)/Qss x 100(%). CLIPS score was calculated based on non-invasive variables (prostate volume, maximal urinary flow, residual urine and voided volume), while BOON2 was calculated using the formula intravesical prostate protrusion (IPP)-3 x Qmax-0.2 x mean voided volume. UDM results were plotted on Schaefer and URA nomograms. Results: A comparative analysis was made using ROC curves. The area under the curve (AUC) for PCRI is 0.85 (PTP 91.3%), while AUC for CLIPS and BOON2 is 0.8 (PTP 77.6%) and 0.82 (PTP 74.5%), respectively. PCRI with the cut-off point of 96% clearly distinguishes obstructed patients with normocontractile detrusor and the presence of detrusor overactivity (DO), versus those unobstructed. CLIPS (>10) shows good BOO prediction, but without the possibility of distinguishing between detrusor contractility grade and the occurrence of DO. BOON2 has shown that impaired contractility has influence on this number in obstructed patients. Conclusion: PCRI is a very good noninvasive urodynamic test for a group-wise detection of BOO in patients with BPE and associated bladder co-morbidities; it is therefore superior in comparison with to CLIPS or BOON2.","PeriodicalId":18414,"journal":{"name":"Medical Archives","volume":"11 1","pages":"81 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2019.73.81-86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim: To determine the discriminatory power of penile urethral compression-release index (PCRI), clinical prostate score (CLIPS) and bladder outlet obstruction index 2 (BOON2) for the detection of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), and the associated bladder abnormality in patients with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Material and methods: In study was included of 135 patients with proven BPE underwent urodynamic measurement (UDM) and PCR maneuver. PCR Index was calculated following the formula: (Qs-Qss)/Qss x 100(%). CLIPS score was calculated based on non-invasive variables (prostate volume, maximal urinary flow, residual urine and voided volume), while BOON2 was calculated using the formula intravesical prostate protrusion (IPP)-3 x Qmax-0.2 x mean voided volume. UDM results were plotted on Schaefer and URA nomograms. Results: A comparative analysis was made using ROC curves. The area under the curve (AUC) for PCRI is 0.85 (PTP 91.3%), while AUC for CLIPS and BOON2 is 0.8 (PTP 77.6%) and 0.82 (PTP 74.5%), respectively. PCRI with the cut-off point of 96% clearly distinguishes obstructed patients with normocontractile detrusor and the presence of detrusor overactivity (DO), versus those unobstructed. CLIPS (>10) shows good BOO prediction, but without the possibility of distinguishing between detrusor contractility grade and the occurrence of DO. BOON2 has shown that impaired contractility has influence on this number in obstructed patients. Conclusion: PCRI is a very good noninvasive urodynamic test for a group-wise detection of BOO in patients with BPE and associated bladder co-morbidities; it is therefore superior in comparison with to CLIPS or BOON2.
阴茎压迫释放指数:与其他无创工具预测良性前列腺增大患者膀胱出口梗阻的评价和比较
目的:探讨阴茎尿道压释指数(PCRI)、临床前列腺评分(CLIPS)和膀胱出口梗阻指数2 (BOON2)对良性前列腺增大(BPE)患者膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)及相关膀胱异常的鉴别能力。材料和方法:本研究纳入135例经证实的BPE患者进行尿动力学测量(UDM)和PCR操作。PCR指数计算公式为:(Qs-Qss)/Qss × 100(%)。CLIPS评分基于非侵入性变量(前列腺体积、最大尿流量、残余尿量和排尿量)计算,BOON2计算公式为膀胱内前列腺突出(IPP)-3 x Qmax-0.2 x平均排尿量。UDM结果绘制在Schaefer图和URA图上。结果:采用ROC曲线进行比较分析。PCRI的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.85 (PTP为91.3%),CLIPS和BOON2的AUC分别为0.8 (PTP为77.6%)和0.82 (PTP为74.5%)。PCRI的分界点为96%,可以清楚地区分出逼尿肌正常收缩和存在逼尿肌过度活动(DO)的梗阻患者与未梗阻患者。CLIPS(>10)显示出良好的BOO预测,但无法区分逼尿肌收缩等级和DO的发生。BOON2表明,在梗阻患者中,收缩功能受损会影响这一数字。结论:PCRI是一种非常好的无创尿动力学检测方法,可用于BPE和相关膀胱合并症患者的BOO群体检测;因此,与CLIPS或BOON2相比,它更优越。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信