Thomas Shadwell’s the Virtuoso as an Assemblage Laboratory. A View from Installation Art

Q3 Arts and Humanities
M. Chaberski
{"title":"Thomas Shadwell’s the Virtuoso as an Assemblage Laboratory. A View from Installation Art","authors":"M. Chaberski","doi":"10.1515/mik-2017-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The contemporary landscape of performing arts becomes more and more populated by hybrid genres or “artistic installations” (Rebentisch) which fuse traditional artistic, theatrical and performance practices with scientific procedures, political activism and designing new technologies (e.g. bioart, technoart, digital art and site-specific performance). In this context, theatre texts can no longer be perceived as autopoietic means of solely artistic expression but become part of an assemblage of different discourses and practices. As contemporary assemblage theory contends (DeLanda), assemblages are relational entities which change dramatically depending on relations between its different human and nonhuman elements and various contexts in which they function. Taking the contemporary installation art as a vantage point, this paper aims to analyse a Restoration comedy The Virtuoso (1676) by Thomas Shadwell in an assemblage of theatrical, scientific and political discourses and practices of Early Modern England. Staged in Dorset Gardens theatre in London, the play mobilised a plethora of discourses of science (the status of experimental philosophy institutionalized in 1660 as the Royal Society), politics (Restoration of the monarchy under Charles II) and gender (the infamous heac vir or effeminate man). Drawing on contemporary new materialism, the paper focuses predominantly on Shadwell’s use of the laboratory as a site of emerging assemblages rather than objective matters of fact. In this context, the play itself becomes an assemblage laboratory where new ways of thinking and being are being forged and constantly negotiated.","PeriodicalId":36225,"journal":{"name":"Art History and Criticism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art History and Criticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mik-2017-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary The contemporary landscape of performing arts becomes more and more populated by hybrid genres or “artistic installations” (Rebentisch) which fuse traditional artistic, theatrical and performance practices with scientific procedures, political activism and designing new technologies (e.g. bioart, technoart, digital art and site-specific performance). In this context, theatre texts can no longer be perceived as autopoietic means of solely artistic expression but become part of an assemblage of different discourses and practices. As contemporary assemblage theory contends (DeLanda), assemblages are relational entities which change dramatically depending on relations between its different human and nonhuman elements and various contexts in which they function. Taking the contemporary installation art as a vantage point, this paper aims to analyse a Restoration comedy The Virtuoso (1676) by Thomas Shadwell in an assemblage of theatrical, scientific and political discourses and practices of Early Modern England. Staged in Dorset Gardens theatre in London, the play mobilised a plethora of discourses of science (the status of experimental philosophy institutionalized in 1660 as the Royal Society), politics (Restoration of the monarchy under Charles II) and gender (the infamous heac vir or effeminate man). Drawing on contemporary new materialism, the paper focuses predominantly on Shadwell’s use of the laboratory as a site of emerging assemblages rather than objective matters of fact. In this context, the play itself becomes an assemblage laboratory where new ways of thinking and being are being forged and constantly negotiated.
托马斯·沙德威尔的《作为组装实验室的艺术大师》装置艺术的视角
当代表演艺术的景观越来越多地被混合流派或“艺术装置”(reentisch)所填充,它们将传统的艺术、戏剧和表演实践与科学程序、政治行动主义和设计新技术(例如生物艺术、技术艺术、数字艺术和特定场地的表演)融合在一起。在这种背景下,戏剧文本不再被视为纯粹艺术表达的自创生手段,而是成为不同话语和实践组合的一部分。正如当代组合理论所主张的那样(DeLanda),组合是一种关系实体,它根据其不同的人类和非人类元素之间的关系以及它们发挥作用的各种环境而发生巨大变化。本文以当代装置艺术为视角,将托马斯·沙德威尔创作的复辟时期喜剧《艺术大师》(1676)放在近代早期英国戏剧、科学和政治话语与实践的集合中进行分析。该剧在伦敦的多塞特花园剧院上演,调动了大量关于科学(实验哲学在1660年作为皇家学会制度化的地位)、政治(查理二世统治下的君主制复辟)和性别(臭名昭著的男同性恋者或女性化的男人)的话语。借鉴当代新唯物主义,本文主要关注Shadwell将实验室作为新兴组合的场所,而不是客观事实。在这种背景下,戏剧本身成为了一个组装实验室,在这里,新的思维方式和存在方式正在被锻造和不断协商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Art History and Criticism
Art History and Criticism Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信