{"title":"Handel’s Transformative Compositional Practices","authors":"David Ross Hurley","doi":"10.1525/jm.2021.38.4.479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades singers of Handel’s music have made great strides in recapturing the art of embellishing his music, thus breathing new life into forms such as the da capo aria. Yet Handel’s own “variations”—his development and transformation of musical material in his vocal music, important for understanding his compositional practice with borrowed as well as (presumably) original music—are not yet fully explored or appreciated. Admittedly, scholars have discussed musical procedures such as inserting, deleting, and reordering musical materials, as well as other Baroque combinatorial practices in Handel’s arias, but the musical transformations I discuss here are closer to a specifically Handelian brand of developing variation. To my knowledge, the concept of developing variation has never before been applied to early eighteenth-century music. I explore the relation of developing variation to drama (also rarely done) in two of Handel’s arias, providing a close examination of “Ombre, piante” from the opera Rodelinda and new thoughts about “Lament not thus,” originally intended for the oratorio Belshazzar. Although these arias belong to different genres and different stages of Handel’s career, they both exhibit material that undergoes a kind of progressive variation process that has tangible musical and dramatic ramifications, of interest to opera specialists and performers. Furthermore, both arias have a complicated compositional history; I offer fresh insights into the aesthetic qualities of each version, thereby throwing light on Handel’s possible compositional intentions. This article also discloses for the first time some recurring musical passages shared between “Lament not thus” and other pieces that could influence the listener’s interpretation of certain musico-dramatic gestures.","PeriodicalId":44168,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MUSICOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MUSICOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/jm.2021.38.4.479","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In recent decades singers of Handel’s music have made great strides in recapturing the art of embellishing his music, thus breathing new life into forms such as the da capo aria. Yet Handel’s own “variations”—his development and transformation of musical material in his vocal music, important for understanding his compositional practice with borrowed as well as (presumably) original music—are not yet fully explored or appreciated. Admittedly, scholars have discussed musical procedures such as inserting, deleting, and reordering musical materials, as well as other Baroque combinatorial practices in Handel’s arias, but the musical transformations I discuss here are closer to a specifically Handelian brand of developing variation. To my knowledge, the concept of developing variation has never before been applied to early eighteenth-century music. I explore the relation of developing variation to drama (also rarely done) in two of Handel’s arias, providing a close examination of “Ombre, piante” from the opera Rodelinda and new thoughts about “Lament not thus,” originally intended for the oratorio Belshazzar. Although these arias belong to different genres and different stages of Handel’s career, they both exhibit material that undergoes a kind of progressive variation process that has tangible musical and dramatic ramifications, of interest to opera specialists and performers. Furthermore, both arias have a complicated compositional history; I offer fresh insights into the aesthetic qualities of each version, thereby throwing light on Handel’s possible compositional intentions. This article also discloses for the first time some recurring musical passages shared between “Lament not thus” and other pieces that could influence the listener’s interpretation of certain musico-dramatic gestures.
近几十年来,演唱亨德尔音乐的歌手们在重新把握美化他的音乐的艺术方面取得了长足的进步,从而为诸如天顶咏叹调这样的形式注入了新的活力。然而,亨德尔自己的“变化”——他在声乐中对音乐材料的发展和转变,对于理解他对借来的以及(可能)原创音乐的作曲实践很重要——尚未得到充分的探索或欣赏。诚然,学者们已经讨论过诸如插入、删除和重新排列音乐材料等音乐过程,以及亨德尔咏叹调中的其他巴洛克式组合实践,但我在这里讨论的音乐转换更接近于亨德尔特有的发展变奏品牌。据我所知,十八世纪早期的音乐中从未出现过发展变奏的概念。我在亨德尔的两首咏叹调中探索了发展变奏与戏剧的关系(也很少这样做),对歌剧《罗德林达》(Rodelinda)中的“Ombre, piante”进行了仔细研究,并对原本打算为清唱剧《伯沙撒》(Belshazzar)创作的《悲歌并非如此》(Lament not thus)进行了新的思考。虽然这些咏叹调属于不同的流派和亨德尔职业生涯的不同阶段,但它们都展示了经历了一种渐进变化过程的材料,这种变化具有切实的音乐和戏剧影响,歌剧专家和表演者对此感兴趣。此外,这两首咏叹调都有复杂的创作历史;我对每个版本的美学品质提供了新的见解,从而揭示了亨德尔可能的作曲意图。本文还首次披露了《悲歌不如此》和其他作品之间反复出现的一些音乐段落,这些段落可能会影响听者对某些音乐戏剧姿态的解释。
期刊介绍:
The widely-respected Journal of Musicology enters its third decade as one of few comprehensive peer-reviewed journals in the discipline, offering articles in every period, field and methodology of musicological scholarship. Its contributors range from senior scholars to new voices in the field. Its reach is international, with recent articles by authors from North America, Europe and Australia, and circulation to individuals and libraries throughout the world.