The takeover of science communication: how science lost its leading role in the public discourse on carbon capture and storage research in daily newspapers in Germany
{"title":"The takeover of science communication: how science lost its leading role in the public discourse on carbon capture and storage research in daily newspapers in Germany","authors":"S. Schneider","doi":"10.5194/GC-2-69-2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. CCS (carbon capture and storage) is an important issue within the context of\nclimate-change mitigation options and has played a major role in the agendas\nof scientists, researchers, and engineers. While media representations of CCS\nin Germany from 2004 to 2014 demonstrated the significant mediatization of\nthe topic, this cannot be ascribed to science. Instead, CCS media coverage in\nGermany has been dominated by other stakeholder groups. While CCS is linked\nto various industry sectors, such as cement and steel production, the German\ndebate has dominantly focussed on the coal and energy branches. This study\nlooks at the role of science and science public relations (PR) within the\nGerman public debate by analysing the media coverage of CCS in daily\nnewspapers from 2004 to 2014. If science wishes to remain proactive within\nscience communication, new approaches for future science PR have to be\ndeduced to strengthen, once again, the role of science communication. Among\nthese approaches, it is important to pursue a more differentiated\nunderstanding of target audiences and regional concerns. Science PR has to\naccept that science itself is no longer the only stakeholder and actor within\nscience communication.\n","PeriodicalId":52877,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Communication","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/GC-2-69-2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Abstract. CCS (carbon capture and storage) is an important issue within the context of
climate-change mitigation options and has played a major role in the agendas
of scientists, researchers, and engineers. While media representations of CCS
in Germany from 2004 to 2014 demonstrated the significant mediatization of
the topic, this cannot be ascribed to science. Instead, CCS media coverage in
Germany has been dominated by other stakeholder groups. While CCS is linked
to various industry sectors, such as cement and steel production, the German
debate has dominantly focussed on the coal and energy branches. This study
looks at the role of science and science public relations (PR) within the
German public debate by analysing the media coverage of CCS in daily
newspapers from 2004 to 2014. If science wishes to remain proactive within
science communication, new approaches for future science PR have to be
deduced to strengthen, once again, the role of science communication. Among
these approaches, it is important to pursue a more differentiated
understanding of target audiences and regional concerns. Science PR has to
accept that science itself is no longer the only stakeholder and actor within
science communication.