Arabic Textbooks Theory Review by Muhammad Ali Al-Khuli l Al-Kutub al-Madrasiyyah al-‘Arabiyyah Bina’an ‘Ala Nadzariyyah Muhammad ‘Aly al-Khuli

Ni'matul Hidayah, Sultan Syahrir, G. Kesuma, Yulia Puspitaningrum
{"title":"Arabic Textbooks Theory Review by Muhammad Ali Al-Khuli l Al-Kutub al-Madrasiyyah al-‘Arabiyyah Bina’an ‘Ala Nadzariyyah Muhammad ‘Aly al-Khuli","authors":"Ni'matul Hidayah, Sultan Syahrir, G. Kesuma, Yulia Puspitaningrum","doi":"10.24042/albayan.v15i1.11547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Textbooks writing must consider the theories put forward by experts who are competent in their field. In this study, the researcher examined textbooks for Islamic junior high school (Madrasah Tsanawiyyah) with guidelines of the research on the theory put forward by Muhammad Ali Al-Khuli. The purpose of this study was to find out whether the mufrodat and tarkib material presented in textbooks was in accordance with the theory presented by Muhammad Ali Al-Khuli. This type of research was library research. The data sources were textbooks and supporting sources such as books, articles, and documents related to the research. Meanwhile, content analysis was used in analyzing the data. Based on the results of the study, it was found that there were still presentations of mufrodat and tarkib that were not in accordance with the theory of linguists. This could affect the process of acquiring a second language for students. If the presentation of the material were not in accordance with the expert's explanation, the acceptance of the material would be less than optimal. It was expected that there would be improvements to the books that are already in circulation. For the printing of the next edition, the editor would be expected to check thoroughly before the book is printed and distributed.","PeriodicalId":33142,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Al Bayan Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Al Bayan Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/albayan.v15i1.11547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Textbooks writing must consider the theories put forward by experts who are competent in their field. In this study, the researcher examined textbooks for Islamic junior high school (Madrasah Tsanawiyyah) with guidelines of the research on the theory put forward by Muhammad Ali Al-Khuli. The purpose of this study was to find out whether the mufrodat and tarkib material presented in textbooks was in accordance with the theory presented by Muhammad Ali Al-Khuli. This type of research was library research. The data sources were textbooks and supporting sources such as books, articles, and documents related to the research. Meanwhile, content analysis was used in analyzing the data. Based on the results of the study, it was found that there were still presentations of mufrodat and tarkib that were not in accordance with the theory of linguists. This could affect the process of acquiring a second language for students. If the presentation of the material were not in accordance with the expert's explanation, the acceptance of the material would be less than optimal. It was expected that there would be improvements to the books that are already in circulation. For the printing of the next edition, the editor would be expected to check thoroughly before the book is printed and distributed.
教科书的编写必须考虑到在该领域有能力的专家提出的理论。在本研究中,研究者以Muhammad Ali Al-Khuli提出的理论研究为指导,对伊斯兰初中(Madrasah Tsanawiyyah)的教科书进行了研究。本研究的目的是找出教科书中所呈现的mufrodat和tarkib材料是否与Muhammad Ali Al-Khuli提出的理论相一致。这种类型的研究是图书馆研究。数据来源为教科书和辅助来源,如与研究相关的书籍、文章和文件。同时,采用内容分析法对数据进行分析。根据研究结果发现,与语言学家的理论不一致的是,仍然存在多语种和多语种的表现。这可能会影响学生学习第二语言的过程。如果材料的提出与专家的解释不一致,材料的接受将不是最理想的。人们期望对已经在流通的书籍进行改进。对于下一版的印刷,编辑应该在该书印刷和分发之前进行彻底检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信