Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness preoperative vs. intraoperative assessment in women with previous cesarean

Frmesk Nawzad Hawez, Aryana Khales Jawad, Mahabad Ali Sabir
{"title":"Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness preoperative vs. intraoperative assessment in women with previous cesarean","authors":"Frmesk Nawzad Hawez, Aryana Khales Jawad, Mahabad Ali Sabir","doi":"10.22317/imj.v6i1.1163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives; In this study we compared transabdominal ultrasound to transvaginal ultrasound to determine which one of them is most accurate in measuring the LUS.\nMethods; a prospective observational study on 100 pregnant at term women with history of previous one CS visited Maternity Teaching Hospital between period Jan 2020 to Sep 2020.\nResults; of total 100 women ( age range 20-42 years), more than half were primiparous and majority were with no history of miscarriage, mean LUS was 4 mm with standard deviation 1.09 in abdominal ultra sound 3.4 with standard deviation 1.14 in transvaginal and 3.45mm with standard deviation 1.2 in intraoperative before delivering head of the baby (p < 0.001).\nConclusion; Trans vaginal ultrasound is more accurate than transabdominal ultrasound in measuring lower uterine segment.","PeriodicalId":32555,"journal":{"name":"Iraq Medical Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraq Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22317/imj.v6i1.1163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives; In this study we compared transabdominal ultrasound to transvaginal ultrasound to determine which one of them is most accurate in measuring the LUS. Methods; a prospective observational study on 100 pregnant at term women with history of previous one CS visited Maternity Teaching Hospital between period Jan 2020 to Sep 2020. Results; of total 100 women ( age range 20-42 years), more than half were primiparous and majority were with no history of miscarriage, mean LUS was 4 mm with standard deviation 1.09 in abdominal ultra sound 3.4 with standard deviation 1.14 in transvaginal and 3.45mm with standard deviation 1.2 in intraoperative before delivering head of the baby (p < 0.001). Conclusion; Trans vaginal ultrasound is more accurate than transabdominal ultrasound in measuring lower uterine segment.
有剖宫产史妇女术前与术中子宫下段厚度的超声评估
目标;在这项研究中,我们比较了经腹超声和经阴道超声,以确定哪一个是最准确的测量超声。对2020年1月至2020年9月在妇产教学医院就诊的100例既往CS病史的足月妊娠妇女进行前瞻性观察研究。100例女性(年龄20 ~ 42岁)中,半数以上为初产,多数为无流产史,腹超声平均LUS为4 mm,标准差1.09,经阴道超声平均LUS为3.4,标准差1.14,术中LUS为3.45mm,标准差1.2 (p < 0.001)。经阴道超声测量子宫下段的准确性高于经腹部超声。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信