A survey of external parasites of free-range chickens and their ethno-veterinary control remedies used by resource-limited farmers in Eastern Cape, South Africa.

B. Moyo, S. Moyo, P. Masika
{"title":"A survey of external parasites of free-range chickens and their ethno-veterinary control remedies used by resource-limited farmers in Eastern Cape, South Africa.","authors":"B. Moyo, S. Moyo, P. Masika","doi":"10.14196/SJVA.V4I2.1820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most rural areas, chicken infestation with external parasites poses a challenge to their productivity and associated benefits. External parasites cause anemia, thus reducing growth, egg production and may lead to death. They are mainly controlled by commercial remedies, although resource-limited farmers resort to using alternative remedies which are available and affordable. This study was conducted to document external parasites of free-range chickens and their ethno-veterinary control remedies used by resource-limited farmers. A questionnaire survey was conducted amongst 93 households, 3 of which were herbalists, in Eastern Cape, South Africa. The farmers considered several external parasites to be a problem: mites (79.6%) stick tight fleas (64.5%), lice (10.8%) and ticks (6.5%). Various ethno-veterinary remedies were used to control the parasites, which included ash (28%), madubula (26.7%) and Jeyes fluid  (10%) both of which are comprised of 13% carbolic acid, paraffin (8.4%), plants (5.2%), used engine oil (2.8%), dip wash (2.5%), doom spray (d-phenothrin 0.4%), blue death (permethrin 0.03%) (1.9%), diesel (1.9%), smoke (0.9%) and a few (4.2%) used conventional insecticides namely karbadust (carbarly 5%) and mercaptothion 5%). A small proportion (7.5%) does not use either of the remedies. The materials used by resource-limited farmers in controlling parasites were identified and documented.","PeriodicalId":17430,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Advances","volume":"43 1","pages":"13-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14196/SJVA.V4I2.1820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In most rural areas, chicken infestation with external parasites poses a challenge to their productivity and associated benefits. External parasites cause anemia, thus reducing growth, egg production and may lead to death. They are mainly controlled by commercial remedies, although resource-limited farmers resort to using alternative remedies which are available and affordable. This study was conducted to document external parasites of free-range chickens and their ethno-veterinary control remedies used by resource-limited farmers. A questionnaire survey was conducted amongst 93 households, 3 of which were herbalists, in Eastern Cape, South Africa. The farmers considered several external parasites to be a problem: mites (79.6%) stick tight fleas (64.5%), lice (10.8%) and ticks (6.5%). Various ethno-veterinary remedies were used to control the parasites, which included ash (28%), madubula (26.7%) and Jeyes fluid  (10%) both of which are comprised of 13% carbolic acid, paraffin (8.4%), plants (5.2%), used engine oil (2.8%), dip wash (2.5%), doom spray (d-phenothrin 0.4%), blue death (permethrin 0.03%) (1.9%), diesel (1.9%), smoke (0.9%) and a few (4.2%) used conventional insecticides namely karbadust (carbarly 5%) and mercaptothion 5%). A small proportion (7.5%) does not use either of the remedies. The materials used by resource-limited farmers in controlling parasites were identified and documented.
对南非东开普省资源有限的农民所使用的散养鸡外源寄生虫及其民族兽医控制补救措施的调查。
在大多数农村地区,鸡感染外源寄生虫对其生产力和相关效益构成挑战。外部寄生虫引起贫血,从而减少生长、产卵,并可能导致死亡。它们主要由商业补救措施控制,尽管资源有限的农民采用可获得和负担得起的替代补救措施。本研究旨在记录自由放养鸡的外源寄生虫及其资源有限的农民使用的民族兽医防治措施。在南非东开普省的93个家庭中进行了问卷调查,其中3个家庭是草药医生。农民认为主要的外源寄生虫有螨(79.6%)、粘蚤(64.5%)、虱子(10.8%)和蜱(6.5%)。采用多种民族兽药防治寄生虫,包括白蜡(28%)、马杜布拉(26.7%)和Jeyes液(10%),这两种药剂均由13%的石炭酸、石蜡(8.4%)、植物(5.2%)、旧机油(2.8%)、浸洗(2.5%)、灭虫喷雾(d-苯氰菊酯0.4%)、蓝死(氯菊酯0.03%)(1.9%)、柴油(1.9%)、烟雾(0.9%)和少量(4.2%)使用的常规杀虫剂,即卡巴德斯特(carbadust) (carbarly 5%)和巯基硫磷5%)组成。一小部分(7.5%)不使用任何一种补救措施。查明并记录了资源有限的农民控制寄生虫所使用的材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信