Organizational Stress and Trauma: Impediments to the Delivery of User-Involvement Models of Care in Substance Use Disorder Treatment

K. Arnett, D. Baron
{"title":"Organizational Stress and Trauma: Impediments to the Delivery of User-Involvement Models of Care in Substance Use Disorder Treatment","authors":"K. Arnett, D. Baron","doi":"10.4172/2155-6105.1000308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of the qualitative study reported in this paper was to expand knowledge of substance use disorder (SUD) care best practices, by examining the experiences of residential SUD care participants with user-involvement/oriented care models. These included person-centered, shared decision-making, recovery model and patient/person participation. The goal of the study was to provide a better understanding of the following: each user-involvement model as it relates to residential SUD care from the perspective of residential SUD care participants, the importance of concretizing the concepts for future empirical studies and the development of a nomenclature for the synthesis of the models to inform future empirical studies and assist practitioners with applying the core concepts of the four models in a way that is congruent with the outcomes of empirical studies. Methods: The author collected data by conducting semi-structured, open-ended, one-on-one interviews with a convenience sample of 12 study subjects between the ages of 24 and 65 years (11 males and 1 female) who selfidentified as having successfully completed at least one residential care program for substance use disorder(s). All interviews were recorded and transcribed, and grounded theory methodology was used to analyze the results. The study design was approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board, February 2016. Results: Data collected from the study subjects represented some degree of experience with all four userinvolvement models in residential substance use disorder care. Data also revealed experiences that represented the opposite of the models, and was indicative of care affected by organizational stress and trauma (e.g. burnout, vicarious trauma) and a lack of trauma-informed care. Conclusion: Subjects perceived the care to be most beneficial in the presence of the user-involvement models; however, quality care was compromised and negated by the presence of organizational stress and trauma and a lack of trauma-informed care. The current study finds organizational stress and trauma and a lack of traumainformed care not only serves as an impediment to the delivery of user-involvement/oriented care models, but becomes the overarching phenomena that undermines and negates the delivery of user-involvement models of care in residential substance use disorder treatment.","PeriodicalId":14828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy","volume":"36 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the qualitative study reported in this paper was to expand knowledge of substance use disorder (SUD) care best practices, by examining the experiences of residential SUD care participants with user-involvement/oriented care models. These included person-centered, shared decision-making, recovery model and patient/person participation. The goal of the study was to provide a better understanding of the following: each user-involvement model as it relates to residential SUD care from the perspective of residential SUD care participants, the importance of concretizing the concepts for future empirical studies and the development of a nomenclature for the synthesis of the models to inform future empirical studies and assist practitioners with applying the core concepts of the four models in a way that is congruent with the outcomes of empirical studies. Methods: The author collected data by conducting semi-structured, open-ended, one-on-one interviews with a convenience sample of 12 study subjects between the ages of 24 and 65 years (11 males and 1 female) who selfidentified as having successfully completed at least one residential care program for substance use disorder(s). All interviews were recorded and transcribed, and grounded theory methodology was used to analyze the results. The study design was approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board, February 2016. Results: Data collected from the study subjects represented some degree of experience with all four userinvolvement models in residential substance use disorder care. Data also revealed experiences that represented the opposite of the models, and was indicative of care affected by organizational stress and trauma (e.g. burnout, vicarious trauma) and a lack of trauma-informed care. Conclusion: Subjects perceived the care to be most beneficial in the presence of the user-involvement models; however, quality care was compromised and negated by the presence of organizational stress and trauma and a lack of trauma-informed care. The current study finds organizational stress and trauma and a lack of traumainformed care not only serves as an impediment to the delivery of user-involvement/oriented care models, but becomes the overarching phenomena that undermines and negates the delivery of user-involvement models of care in residential substance use disorder treatment.
组织压力与创伤:物质使用障碍治疗中使用者介入模式的障碍
目的:本文定性研究的目的是通过考察使用用户参与/导向护理模式的住院药物使用障碍护理参与者的经验,扩大对药物使用障碍护理最佳实践的认识。其中包括以人为本、共同决策、康复模式和患者/个人参与。这项研究的目的是为了更好地了解以下情况:每个用户参与模型,因为它从住宿SUD护理参与者的角度与住宿SUD护理有关,将概念具体化对未来实证研究的重要性,以及为模型的综合制定命名法的重要性,以便为未来的实证研究提供信息,并帮助从业者以与实证研究结果一致的方式应用四个模型的核心概念。方法:作者通过半结构化、开放式、一对一访谈的方式收集数据,选取了12名年龄在24岁至65岁之间的研究对象(11名男性和1名女性),这些研究对象自认为已经成功完成了至少一个药物使用障碍的住院治疗项目。所有访谈均被记录和转录,并采用扎根理论方法对结果进行分析。该研究设计已于2016年2月获得宾夕法尼亚大学机构审查委员会的批准。结果:从研究对象收集的数据代表了在住宅物质使用障碍护理中所有四种使用者参与模型的一定程度的经验。数据还揭示了与模型相反的经验,表明护理受到组织压力和创伤(例如倦怠,替代创伤)的影响,以及缺乏创伤知情护理。结论:被试认为在用户介入模型存在的情况下,关怀是最有益的;然而,由于组织压力和创伤的存在以及缺乏创伤知情护理,质量护理受到损害和否定。目前的研究发现,组织压力和创伤以及创伤型护理的缺乏不仅是用户参与/导向护理模式提供的障碍,而且成为破坏和否定住宅物质使用障碍治疗中用户参与护理模式提供的首要现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信