A comparison of the flammability of aluminium sieve trays and aluminium packing in air separation units

Anton Kirzinger, Eberhard Lassmann
{"title":"A comparison of the flammability of aluminium sieve trays and aluminium packing in air separation units","authors":"Anton Kirzinger,&nbsp;Eberhard Lassmann","doi":"10.1016/0950-4214(95)92177-E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In air separation units, aluminium structured packing may be used instead of aluminium sieve trays for the cryogenic distillation of air. In previously published experiments regarding the flammability of packing in oxygen-enriched atmospheres, strong energy releases have been reported under conditions which did not correspond to realistic operating conditions.</p><p>In additional tests with packing under simulated operating conditions, no propagation of combustion was observed even with strong promoters. Therefore, the authors confirmed the compatibility of aluminium packing for use in air separation units under operating conditions.</p><p>In this paper, experiments are described to compare the flammability of aluminium sieve trays, which have been used for more than 30 years in distillation columns, with aluminium packing under similar conditions.</p><p>It was found that under similar test conditions, sieve trays as well as packing are flammable. In flammability tests, violent energy releases were observed with the strong promoter thermite; however, no differences in flammability between sieve trays and packing were noticed. Comparing the flammability of the sieve trays, in use for more than 30 years in distillation columns, with packing, it was concluded that sieve trays can be substituted by packing without any additional risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12586,"journal":{"name":"Gas Separation & Purification","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 49-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0950-4214(95)92177-E","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gas Separation & Purification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/095042149592177E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In air separation units, aluminium structured packing may be used instead of aluminium sieve trays for the cryogenic distillation of air. In previously published experiments regarding the flammability of packing in oxygen-enriched atmospheres, strong energy releases have been reported under conditions which did not correspond to realistic operating conditions.

In additional tests with packing under simulated operating conditions, no propagation of combustion was observed even with strong promoters. Therefore, the authors confirmed the compatibility of aluminium packing for use in air separation units under operating conditions.

In this paper, experiments are described to compare the flammability of aluminium sieve trays, which have been used for more than 30 years in distillation columns, with aluminium packing under similar conditions.

It was found that under similar test conditions, sieve trays as well as packing are flammable. In flammability tests, violent energy releases were observed with the strong promoter thermite; however, no differences in flammability between sieve trays and packing were noticed. Comparing the flammability of the sieve trays, in use for more than 30 years in distillation columns, with packing, it was concluded that sieve trays can be substituted by packing without any additional risks.

空分装置中铝筛盘与铝填料的可燃性比较
在空气分离装置中,可使用铝结构填料代替铝筛盘进行空气的低温蒸馏。在先前发表的关于填料在富氧环境中的可燃性的实验中,在与实际操作条件不相符的条件下报告了强烈的能量释放。在模拟操作条件下的附加试验中,即使使用强助剂,也没有观察到燃烧的传播。因此,作者确认了铝填料在操作条件下用于空分装置的兼容性。在相似条件下,对已在精馏塔上使用了30多年的铝筛塔板与铝填料的可燃性进行了试验比较。发现在类似的试验条件下,筛盘和填料都是易燃的。在可燃性试验中,强促进剂铝热剂能释放剧烈;然而,没有区别的可燃性之间的筛盘和填料被注意到。通过对精馏塔中使用30多年的筛塔与填料的可燃性进行比较,得出用填料代替筛塔无任何附加风险的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信