Reflecting on languaging in written narratives to enact personal relations

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
R. Beach, Dr Limarys Caraballo
{"title":"Reflecting on languaging in written narratives to enact personal relations","authors":"R. Beach, Dr Limarys Caraballo","doi":"10.1108/etpc-11-2019-0157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nUnlike formalist and functional approaches to literacy and teaching writing, a languaging theory approach centers on the dynamic and interpersonal nature of writing. The purpose of this study was to determine students’ ability to engage in explicit reflection about their languaging actions in response to their personal narrative writing to determine those types of actions they were most versus less likely to focus on for enacting relations with others, as well as how they applied their reflections to subsequent interactions with others.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this qualitative study, thirty seven 12th grade students were asked to write personal narratives and then reflect in writing on their use of languaging actions in their narratives based on specific prompts. Students’ explicit reflections about their narratives were coded based on their reference to seven different types of languaging actions for enacting relations with others.\n\n\nFindings\nStudents were most likely to focus their reflections on making connections, understandings, collaboration and support by and for others as well as expression of emotions, getting feelings out, sharing issues; followed by references to conflicts, arguing, stress, negative perceptions or exclusion; references to ideas or impressions about ethics, respect, values, morals; use of “insider language;” slang, jargon, dialects; use of humor, joking, parody; and references to adult and authorities’ perceptions or influences.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis research was limited to students’ portrayals of their languaging actions through writing as opposed to observations of their lived-world interactions with others.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThese results suggest the value of having students engage in explicit reflections about their languaging actions portrayed in narratives as contributing to their growth in use of languaging actions for enacting relations with others.\n\n\nSocial implications\nStudents’ ability to reflect on their language actions enhances their ability to enact social relations.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nA languaging perspective provides an alternative approach for analyzing reflections on types of languaging actions.\n","PeriodicalId":45885,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching-Practice and Critique","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching-Practice and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-11-2019-0157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Unlike formalist and functional approaches to literacy and teaching writing, a languaging theory approach centers on the dynamic and interpersonal nature of writing. The purpose of this study was to determine students’ ability to engage in explicit reflection about their languaging actions in response to their personal narrative writing to determine those types of actions they were most versus less likely to focus on for enacting relations with others, as well as how they applied their reflections to subsequent interactions with others. Design/methodology/approach In this qualitative study, thirty seven 12th grade students were asked to write personal narratives and then reflect in writing on their use of languaging actions in their narratives based on specific prompts. Students’ explicit reflections about their narratives were coded based on their reference to seven different types of languaging actions for enacting relations with others. Findings Students were most likely to focus their reflections on making connections, understandings, collaboration and support by and for others as well as expression of emotions, getting feelings out, sharing issues; followed by references to conflicts, arguing, stress, negative perceptions or exclusion; references to ideas or impressions about ethics, respect, values, morals; use of “insider language;” slang, jargon, dialects; use of humor, joking, parody; and references to adult and authorities’ perceptions or influences. Research limitations/implications This research was limited to students’ portrayals of their languaging actions through writing as opposed to observations of their lived-world interactions with others. Practical implications These results suggest the value of having students engage in explicit reflections about their languaging actions portrayed in narratives as contributing to their growth in use of languaging actions for enacting relations with others. Social implications Students’ ability to reflect on their language actions enhances their ability to enact social relations. Originality/value A languaging perspective provides an alternative approach for analyzing reflections on types of languaging actions.
在书面叙述中反思语言,以制定个人关系
目的与形式主义和功能主义的读写和写作教学方法不同,语言理论方法侧重于写作的动态性和人际性。这项研究的目的是确定学生在回应他们的个人叙述写作时对他们的语言行为进行明确反思的能力,以确定他们在与他人建立关系时最关注哪些类型的行为,以及他们如何将这些反思应用于随后与他人的互动。设计/方法/方法在这个定性研究中,37名12年级的学生被要求写个人叙述,然后根据特定的提示在书面上反映他们在叙述中使用的语言行为。学生对自己叙述的明确反思是基于他们对与他人建立关系的七种不同语言行为的参考而编码的。研究发现:学生们最有可能将他们的思考集中在建立联系、理解、合作和支持他人以及表达情感、发泄情感、分享问题上;其次是冲突、争论、压力、负面看法或排斥;指对伦理、尊重、价值、道德的想法或印象;使用“内部语言”,俚语,行话,方言;幽默、开玩笑、模仿的运用;以及成年人和权威人士的看法或影响。研究局限/启示:这项研究仅限于学生通过写作描述他们的语言行为,而不是观察他们与他人在现实世界中的互动。这些结果表明,让学生对叙事中描述的语言行为进行明确反思的价值,有助于他们在使用语言行为来建立与他人的关系方面的成长。社会含义学生反思自己语言行为的能力增强了他们建立社会关系的能力。原创性/价值语言视角为分析对语言行为类型的反思提供了另一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: English Teaching: Practice and Critique seeks to promote research and theory related to English literacy that is grounded in a range of contexts: classrooms, schools and wider educational constituencies. The journal has as its main focus English teaching in L1 settings. Submissions focused on EFL will be considered only if they have clear pertinence to English literacy in L1 settings. It provides a place where authors from a range of backgrounds can identify matters of common concern and thereby foster broad professional communities and networks. Where possible, English Teaching: Practice and Critique encourages comparative approaches to topics and issues. The journal published three types of manuscripts: research articles, essays (theoretical papers, reviews, and responses), and teacher narratives. Often special issues of the journal focus on distinct topics; however, unthemed manuscript submissions are always welcome and published in most issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信