Average ordinary least squares‐centered penalized regression: A more efficient way to address multicollinearity than ridge regression

IF 1.4 3区 数学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Wei Wang, Linjiang Li, Sheng Li, F. Yin, Fang Liao, Zhang Tao, Xiaosong Li, Xiong Xiao, Yue Ma
{"title":"Average ordinary least squares‐centered penalized regression: A more efficient way to address multicollinearity than ridge regression","authors":"Wei Wang, Linjiang Li, Sheng Li, F. Yin, Fang Liao, Zhang Tao, Xiaosong Li, Xiong Xiao, Yue Ma","doi":"10.1111/stan.12263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We developed a novel method to address multicollinearity in linear models called average ordinary least squares (OLS)‐centered penalized regression (AOPR). AOPR penalizes the cost function to shrink the estimators toward the weighted‐average OLS estimator. The commonly used ridge regression (RR) shrinks the estimators toward zero, that is, employs penalization prior β∼N(0,1/k) in the Bayesian view, which contradicts the common real prior β≠0 . Therefore, RR selects small penalization coefficients to relieve such a contradiction and thus makes the penalizations inadequate. Mathematical derivations remind us that AOPR could increase the performance of RR and OLS regression. A simulation study shows that AOPR obtains more accurate estimators than OLS regression in most situations and more accurate estimators than RR when the signs of the true β s are identical and is slightly less accurate than RR when the signs of the true β s are different. Additionally, a case study shows that AOPR obtains more stable estimators and stronger statistical power and predictive ability than RR and OLS regression. Through these results, we recommend using AOPR to address multicollinearity more efficiently than RR and OLS regression, especially when the true β s have identical signs.","PeriodicalId":51178,"journal":{"name":"Statistica Neerlandica","volume":"88 1","pages":"347 - 368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistica Neerlandica","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We developed a novel method to address multicollinearity in linear models called average ordinary least squares (OLS)‐centered penalized regression (AOPR). AOPR penalizes the cost function to shrink the estimators toward the weighted‐average OLS estimator. The commonly used ridge regression (RR) shrinks the estimators toward zero, that is, employs penalization prior β∼N(0,1/k) in the Bayesian view, which contradicts the common real prior β≠0 . Therefore, RR selects small penalization coefficients to relieve such a contradiction and thus makes the penalizations inadequate. Mathematical derivations remind us that AOPR could increase the performance of RR and OLS regression. A simulation study shows that AOPR obtains more accurate estimators than OLS regression in most situations and more accurate estimators than RR when the signs of the true β s are identical and is slightly less accurate than RR when the signs of the true β s are different. Additionally, a case study shows that AOPR obtains more stable estimators and stronger statistical power and predictive ability than RR and OLS regression. Through these results, we recommend using AOPR to address multicollinearity more efficiently than RR and OLS regression, especially when the true β s have identical signs.
平均普通最小二乘中心惩罚回归:一种比脊回归更有效的解决多重共线性的方法
我们开发了一种新的方法来解决线性模型中的多重共线性,称为平均普通最小二乘(OLS)中心惩罚回归(AOPR)。AOPR对代价函数进行惩罚,将估计器缩小到加权平均OLS估计器。常用的脊回归(RR)将估计量缩小到零,即在贝叶斯观点中使用惩罚先验β ~ N(0,1/k),这与常见的实先验β≠0相矛盾。因此,RR选择较小的惩罚系数来缓解这种矛盾,从而使惩罚不足。数学推导提醒我们,AOPR可以提高RR和OLS回归的性能。仿真研究表明,在大多数情况下,AOPR的估计精度高于OLS回归,当真β s的符号相同时,AOPR的估计精度高于RR,当真β s的符号不同时,AOPR的估计精度略低于RR。此外,实例研究表明,AOPR比RR和OLS回归获得了更稳定的估计量和更强的统计能力和预测能力。通过这些结果,我们建议使用AOPR比RR和OLS回归更有效地解决多重共线性问题,特别是当真β s具有相同的符号时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistica Neerlandica
Statistica Neerlandica 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistica Neerlandica has been the journal of the Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research since 1946. It covers all areas of statistics, from theoretical to applied, with a special emphasis on mathematical statistics, statistics for the behavioural sciences and biostatistics. This wide scope is reflected by the expertise of the journal’s editors representing these areas. The diverse editorial board is committed to a fast and fair reviewing process, and will judge submissions on quality, correctness, relevance and originality. Statistica Neerlandica encourages transparency and reproducibility, and offers online resources to make data, code, simulation results and other additional materials publicly available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信