Informing Healthcare Alarm Design and Use: A Human Factors Cross-Industry Perspective

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY
Zoe M. Pruitt, Lucy S. Bocknek, Deanna-Nicole Busog, Patricia A. Spaar, Arianna P. Milicia, Jessica L. Howe, Ella S. Franklin, Seth Krevat, Rebecca Jones, R. Ratwani
{"title":"Informing Healthcare Alarm Design and Use: A Human Factors Cross-Industry Perspective","authors":"Zoe M. Pruitt, Lucy S. Bocknek, Deanna-Nicole Busog, Patricia A. Spaar, Arianna P. Milicia, Jessica L. Howe, Ella S. Franklin, Seth Krevat, Rebecca Jones, R. Ratwani","doi":"10.33940/med/2023.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Alarms are signals intended to capture and direct human attention to a potential issue that may require monitoring, assessment, or intervention and play a critical safety role in high-risk industries. Healthcare relies heavily on auditory and visual alarms. While there are some guidelines to inform alarm design and use, alarm fatigue and other alarm issues are challenges in the healthcare setting. Automotive, aviation, and nuclear industries have used the science of human factors to develop alarm design and use guidelines. These guidelines may provide important insights for advancing patient safety in healthcare.\n\nMethods: We identified documents containing alarm design and use guidelines from the automotive, aviation, and nuclear industries that have been endorsed by oversight agencies. These guidelines were reviewed by human factors and clinical experts to identify those most relevant to healthcare, qualitatively analyze the relevant guidelines to identify meaningful topics, synthesize the guidelines under each topic to identify key commonalities and differences, and describe how the guidelines might be considered by healthcare stakeholders to improve alarm design and use.\n\nResults: A total of 356 guidelines were extracted from industry documents (2012–present) and 327 (91.9%) were deemed relevant to healthcare. A qualitative analysis of relevant guidelines resulted in nine distinct topics: Alarm Reduction, Appropriateness, Context-Dependence, Design Characteristics, Mental Model, Prioritization, Specificity, Urgency, and User Control. There were several commonalities, as well as some differences, across industry guidelines. The guidelines under each topic were found to inform the auditory or visual modality, or both. Certain guidelines have clear considerations for healthcare stakeholders, especially technology developers and healthcare facilities.\n\nConclusion: Numerous guidelines from other high-risk industries can inform alarm design and use in healthcare. Healthcare facilities can use the information presented as a framework for working with their technology developers to appropriately design and modify alarming technologies and can evaluate their clinical environments to see how alarming technologies might be improved.","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"221 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33940/med/2023.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Alarms are signals intended to capture and direct human attention to a potential issue that may require monitoring, assessment, or intervention and play a critical safety role in high-risk industries. Healthcare relies heavily on auditory and visual alarms. While there are some guidelines to inform alarm design and use, alarm fatigue and other alarm issues are challenges in the healthcare setting. Automotive, aviation, and nuclear industries have used the science of human factors to develop alarm design and use guidelines. These guidelines may provide important insights for advancing patient safety in healthcare. Methods: We identified documents containing alarm design and use guidelines from the automotive, aviation, and nuclear industries that have been endorsed by oversight agencies. These guidelines were reviewed by human factors and clinical experts to identify those most relevant to healthcare, qualitatively analyze the relevant guidelines to identify meaningful topics, synthesize the guidelines under each topic to identify key commonalities and differences, and describe how the guidelines might be considered by healthcare stakeholders to improve alarm design and use. Results: A total of 356 guidelines were extracted from industry documents (2012–present) and 327 (91.9%) were deemed relevant to healthcare. A qualitative analysis of relevant guidelines resulted in nine distinct topics: Alarm Reduction, Appropriateness, Context-Dependence, Design Characteristics, Mental Model, Prioritization, Specificity, Urgency, and User Control. There were several commonalities, as well as some differences, across industry guidelines. The guidelines under each topic were found to inform the auditory or visual modality, or both. Certain guidelines have clear considerations for healthcare stakeholders, especially technology developers and healthcare facilities. Conclusion: Numerous guidelines from other high-risk industries can inform alarm design and use in healthcare. Healthcare facilities can use the information presented as a framework for working with their technology developers to appropriately design and modify alarming technologies and can evaluate their clinical environments to see how alarming technologies might be improved.
告知医疗警报设计和使用:一个跨行业的人为因素视角
背景:警报是一种信号,旨在捕捉和引导人们关注可能需要监测、评估或干预的潜在问题,并在高风险行业中发挥关键的安全作用。医疗保健严重依赖于听觉和视觉警报。虽然有一些指导方针可以指导警报的设计和使用,但警报疲劳和其他警报问题是医疗保健环境中的挑战。汽车、航空和核工业已经利用人为因素科学来制定报警器的设计和使用指南。这些指南可能为提高医疗保健中的患者安全提供重要见解。方法:我们从汽车、航空和核工业中找到了包含警报设计和使用指南的文件,这些文件已经得到了监管机构的认可。人为因素和临床专家对这些指南进行了审查,以确定与医疗保健最相关的指南,对相关指南进行定性分析,以确定有意义的主题,对每个主题下的指南进行综合,以确定关键的共性和差异,并描述医疗保健利益相关者如何考虑指南,以改进警报设计和使用。结果:从2012年至今的行业文件中共提取出356条指南,其中327条(91.9%)被认为与医疗保健相关。对相关指南的定性分析产生了九个不同的主题:减少警报、适当性、上下文依赖性、设计特征、心理模型、优先级、特异性、紧迫性和用户控制。在行业指南中,有几个共同点,也有一些差异。每个主题下的指导方针被发现告知听觉或视觉形式,或两者兼而有之。某些指导方针明确考虑了医疗保健利益相关者,特别是技术开发人员和医疗保健机构。结论:来自其他高风险行业的许多指南可以为医疗保健中的警报设计和使用提供指导。医疗保健机构可以使用提供的信息作为框架,与其技术开发人员合作,适当地设计和修改警报技术,并可以评估其临床环境,以了解如何改进警报技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信