EFFECT OF MELITTIN AND THEPAX AS NATURAL ALTERNATIVES TO TRADITIONAL ANTIMICROBIAL AND ANTIVIRAL TREATMENTS ON BROILER PERFORMANCE AND SOME RELATED TRAITS

mohamed ibrahim el-malky, M. Osman, Azza Elsebai, Mohamed H. Khalil, A. Safwat
{"title":"EFFECT OF MELITTIN AND THEPAX AS NATURAL ALTERNATIVES TO TRADITIONAL ANTIMICROBIAL AND ANTIVIRAL TREATMENTS ON BROILER PERFORMANCE AND SOME RELATED TRAITS","authors":"mohamed ibrahim el-malky, M. Osman, Azza Elsebai, Mohamed H. Khalil, A. Safwat","doi":"10.21608/epsj.2021.197896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was performed to evaluate the untraditional natural additives (Melittin and Thepax) as prospective alternatives to classical therapy treatment through studying their effects on productive performance, carcass characteristics, meat composition and economic efficiency of broiler chicks. A total of 810 one-day old chicks, were randomly distributed into nine experimental groups of 90 birds in three replicates. The experimental treatments were: T1= Control, T2= Melittin (83.3 μg/L), T3= Melittin (166.6 μg/L), T4= Thepax (0.25 g/kg), T5= Thepax (0.5 g/kg), T6= Melittin (83.3 μg/L) + Thepax (0.25 g/kg), T7= Melittin (166.6 μg/L) + Thepax (0.25 g/kg), T8= Melittin (83.3 μg/L) + Thepax (0.5 g/kg), T9= Melittin (166.6 μg/L) + Thepax (0.5 g/kg). The results revealed that the highest BW and BWG were achieved by birds of T6 and T7 (with 8.84, 7.97% and 9.05, 8.13% higher than the control group, respectively). Moreover, birds treated with the various combinations of Thepax and Melittin (T6, T7, T8, and T9) had significantly the best FCR values (with 10.38% improvement, on average, compared to the control group). The same previous groups had significantly the lowest mortality rates. Birds of T6 recorded the highest European production efficiency factor being 376.73. Additionally, broilers treated with various combinations of Melittin and Thepax had significantly the highest carcass weight with the lowest abdominal fat percentages. It could be observed also that birds treated with higher Melittin level (T3, T7 or T9 groups) had significantly the lowest breast protein percentages and the highest fat composition. Finally, broilers of T6 obtained the best economic efficiency value. In conclusion, supplementing broilers with 83.3 μg Melittin /L water + 0.25 g Thepax /kg feed could be used to replace the classical veterinary treatments, that provides beneficial effects on productive performance, health status, and carcass quality of broilers with improving the economic efficiency of broiler production.","PeriodicalId":11662,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Poultry Science Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Poultry Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/epsj.2021.197896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present study was performed to evaluate the untraditional natural additives (Melittin and Thepax) as prospective alternatives to classical therapy treatment through studying their effects on productive performance, carcass characteristics, meat composition and economic efficiency of broiler chicks. A total of 810 one-day old chicks, were randomly distributed into nine experimental groups of 90 birds in three replicates. The experimental treatments were: T1= Control, T2= Melittin (83.3 μg/L), T3= Melittin (166.6 μg/L), T4= Thepax (0.25 g/kg), T5= Thepax (0.5 g/kg), T6= Melittin (83.3 μg/L) + Thepax (0.25 g/kg), T7= Melittin (166.6 μg/L) + Thepax (0.25 g/kg), T8= Melittin (83.3 μg/L) + Thepax (0.5 g/kg), T9= Melittin (166.6 μg/L) + Thepax (0.5 g/kg). The results revealed that the highest BW and BWG were achieved by birds of T6 and T7 (with 8.84, 7.97% and 9.05, 8.13% higher than the control group, respectively). Moreover, birds treated with the various combinations of Thepax and Melittin (T6, T7, T8, and T9) had significantly the best FCR values (with 10.38% improvement, on average, compared to the control group). The same previous groups had significantly the lowest mortality rates. Birds of T6 recorded the highest European production efficiency factor being 376.73. Additionally, broilers treated with various combinations of Melittin and Thepax had significantly the highest carcass weight with the lowest abdominal fat percentages. It could be observed also that birds treated with higher Melittin level (T3, T7 or T9 groups) had significantly the lowest breast protein percentages and the highest fat composition. Finally, broilers of T6 obtained the best economic efficiency value. In conclusion, supplementing broilers with 83.3 μg Melittin /L water + 0.25 g Thepax /kg feed could be used to replace the classical veterinary treatments, that provides beneficial effects on productive performance, health status, and carcass quality of broilers with improving the economic efficiency of broiler production.
蜂毒素和thepax作为传统抗菌和抗病毒处理的天然替代品对肉鸡生产性能及相关性状的影响
本试验旨在通过对肉鸡生产性能、胴体特性、肉成分和经济效益的影响,评价非传统天然添加剂(蜂毒素和Thepax)作为传统治疗的潜在替代品。试验选用日龄雏鸡810只,随机分为9个试验组,每组90只,分3个重复。试验处理为:T1=对照,T2= Melittin (83.3 μg/L), T3= Melittin (166.6 μg/L), T4= Thepax (0.25 g/kg), T5= Thepax (0.5 g/kg), T6= Melittin (83.3 μg/L) + Thepax (0.25 g/kg), T7= Melittin (166.6 μg/L) + Thepax (0.25 g/kg), T8= Melittin (83.3 μg/L) + Thepax (0.5 g/kg), T9= Melittin (166.6 μg/L) + Thepax (0.5 g/kg)。结果表明,T6和T7组的体重和体增重最高,分别比对照组高8.84、7.97%和9.05、8.13%。T6、T7、T8和T9组合处理的FCR值显著高于对照组(平均提高10.38%)。同样的前一组的死亡率明显最低。T6禽的欧洲生产效率系数最高,为376.73。此外,各组合处理的肉仔鸡胴体重最高,腹脂率最低。T3、T7和T9组蜂毒素水平越高,胸蛋白比例越低,脂肪组成越高。最终,T6期肉鸡获得最佳经济效益值。综上所述,在肉鸡饲粮中添加83.3 μg Melittin /L水+ 0.25 g Thepax /kg饲料可替代传统兽医处理,对肉鸡生产性能、健康状况和胴体品质均有有益影响,并可提高肉鸡生产经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信