Cephalometric evaluation of posterior airway space in Chinese and Egyptian races

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Abdel-rahman Mohamed, Yaosen Chen, Khaled Wafaie, Maher Al-balaa, Bayan M. Abusafia, O. M. Mohammed, Yan Yang, Yiqiang Qiao
{"title":"Cephalometric evaluation of posterior airway space in Chinese and Egyptian races","authors":"Abdel-rahman Mohamed, Yaosen Chen, Khaled Wafaie, Maher Al-balaa, Bayan M. Abusafia, O. M. Mohammed, Yan Yang, Yiqiang Qiao","doi":"10.25259/apos_17_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe aim of this study was to evaluate the size of posterior airway space (PAS) and hyoid bone position in Chinese and Egyptian races in both genders using cephalometry.\n\n\n\nLateral Cephalometric X-ray were collected from 195 healthy young adults (96 Chinese subjects and 99 Egyptian subjects). Twenty cephalometric measurements (linear and angular) of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, tongue, and hyoid bone were recorded. Considering gender, according to the ANB angle, the subjects were classified into three types of skeletal malocclusion: class I (1° ≤ ANB ≤ 3°), class II (ANB > 3°), and class III (ANB < 1°). Probability (P) ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Confident intervals of 95% were used and P < 0.05 was considered to represent statistically significant differences.\n\n\n\nSignificant differences were founded in (PNS-V) (P ≤ 0.01), (TT-V) (P ≤ 0.05), ([Hy-Me-MP] [P ≤ 0.01] [Hyoid–MP-Prep] [P ≤ 0.05] [Hy-C3] [P ≤ 0.01] and [Hy-S] [P ≤ 0.05]), and (PNS-U) between Class II and Class III (P ≤ 0.05) in Chinese group. Significant differences were founded in (TT_FH) (P < 0.001), (Hy_RGn) (P < 0.001), Hyoid bone and C3 (Hy_C3) (P < 0.05), (DeepPharyxatPog) (P < 0.05), and (Hy_C3) between Class I and Class II (P < 0.05) in Egyptian group.\n\n\n\nThere is no direct clinical implication of this study. However, the study shows a reference of the average size of PAS in both genders of Egyptian and Chinese races. Gender showed a significant influence on the PAS dimensions in both Chinese and Egyptian individuals. Sexual dimorphism may account for larger airway dimensions and hyoid bone geometry in both Chinese and Egyptian males.\n","PeriodicalId":42593,"journal":{"name":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_17_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the size of posterior airway space (PAS) and hyoid bone position in Chinese and Egyptian races in both genders using cephalometry. Lateral Cephalometric X-ray were collected from 195 healthy young adults (96 Chinese subjects and 99 Egyptian subjects). Twenty cephalometric measurements (linear and angular) of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, tongue, and hyoid bone were recorded. Considering gender, according to the ANB angle, the subjects were classified into three types of skeletal malocclusion: class I (1° ≤ ANB ≤ 3°), class II (ANB > 3°), and class III (ANB < 1°). Probability (P) ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Confident intervals of 95% were used and P < 0.05 was considered to represent statistically significant differences. Significant differences were founded in (PNS-V) (P ≤ 0.01), (TT-V) (P ≤ 0.05), ([Hy-Me-MP] [P ≤ 0.01] [Hyoid–MP-Prep] [P ≤ 0.05] [Hy-C3] [P ≤ 0.01] and [Hy-S] [P ≤ 0.05]), and (PNS-U) between Class II and Class III (P ≤ 0.05) in Chinese group. Significant differences were founded in (TT_FH) (P < 0.001), (Hy_RGn) (P < 0.001), Hyoid bone and C3 (Hy_C3) (P < 0.05), (DeepPharyxatPog) (P < 0.05), and (Hy_C3) between Class I and Class II (P < 0.05) in Egyptian group. There is no direct clinical implication of this study. However, the study shows a reference of the average size of PAS in both genders of Egyptian and Chinese races. Gender showed a significant influence on the PAS dimensions in both Chinese and Egyptian individuals. Sexual dimorphism may account for larger airway dimensions and hyoid bone geometry in both Chinese and Egyptian males.
中国和埃及人种后气道空间的头颅测量评价
本研究的目的是评估中国人和埃及人的后气道间隙(PAS)大小和舌骨位置,无论男女。采集195名健康青年(96名中国人,99名埃及人)的侧位头颅x线片。记录了鼻咽、口咽、下咽、舌和舌骨的20个测量值(线性和角形)。考虑性别,根据ANB角度将受试者分为三类骨错:ⅰ类(1°≤ANB≤3°)、ⅱ类(ANB > 3°)、ⅲ类(ANB < 1°)。概率(P)≤0.05认为有统计学意义。置信区间为95%,P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。中文组在(PNS-V) (P≤0.01)、(TT-V) (P≤0.05)、([Hy-Me-MP] [P≤0.01][Hyoid-MP-Prep] [P≤0.05][Hy-C3] [P≤0.01]和[Hy-S] [P≤0.05])和(PNS-U) (P≤0.05)方面存在显著差异。埃及组I类与II类在(TT_FH) (P < 0.001)、(Hy_RGn) (P < 0.001)、舌骨和C3 (Hy_C3) (P < 0.05)、(DeepPharyxatPog) (P < 0.05)、(Hy_C3)方面差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。本研究无直接临床意义。然而,该研究显示了埃及和中国种族中两性的PAS平均大小的参考。性别对中国人和埃及人的PAS维度都有显著影响。两性二态性可能是中国和埃及男性气道尺寸和舌骨几何形状较大的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
APOS Trends in Orthodontics
APOS Trends in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信