Increasing Pizza Box Assembly Using Task Analysis and a Least-To-Most Prompting Hierarchy

Pub Date : 2023-01-27 DOI:10.1080/07317107.2023.2170197
Erin F. Stabnow, Heather K. Rieger, William J. Sweeney
{"title":"Increasing Pizza Box Assembly Using Task Analysis and a Least-To-Most Prompting Hierarchy","authors":"Erin F. Stabnow, Heather K. Rieger, William J. Sweeney","doi":"10.1080/07317107.2023.2170197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine whether a least-to-most prompting hierarchy was effective in teaching students with intellectual disabilities to increase the number of task-analyzed steps independently completed related to folding a pizza box as a potential pre-vocational task. An additional and related purpose of this study was to determine whether a least-to-most prompting hierarchy was effective for improving these students’ productivity while decreasing the level of least-to-most prompts required to complete task-analyzed steps of a pizza box assembly task. A multiple-baseline design across subjects was used to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of a least-to-most prompting hierarchy. Results of this study indicated that the use of a task analysis and a least-to-most prompting hierarchy was effective in teaching individuals with intellectual disabilities pizza box assembly skills. Implications and recommendations for the use of a task analysis with least-to-most prompts for teaching complex vocational tasks to individuals with intellectual disabilities as well as possibilities for future research were also discussed.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317107.2023.2170197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine whether a least-to-most prompting hierarchy was effective in teaching students with intellectual disabilities to increase the number of task-analyzed steps independently completed related to folding a pizza box as a potential pre-vocational task. An additional and related purpose of this study was to determine whether a least-to-most prompting hierarchy was effective for improving these students’ productivity while decreasing the level of least-to-most prompts required to complete task-analyzed steps of a pizza box assembly task. A multiple-baseline design across subjects was used to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of a least-to-most prompting hierarchy. Results of this study indicated that the use of a task analysis and a least-to-most prompting hierarchy was effective in teaching individuals with intellectual disabilities pizza box assembly skills. Implications and recommendations for the use of a task analysis with least-to-most prompts for teaching complex vocational tasks to individuals with intellectual disabilities as well as possibilities for future research were also discussed.
分享
查看原文
使用任务分析和最少到最多提示层次结构增加披萨盒组装
摘要:本研究的目的是确定最少到最多提示层次是否有效地指导智障学生增加独立完成与叠披萨盒相关的任务分析步骤的数量,作为一项潜在的职业前任务。本研究的另一个相关目的是确定在减少完成披萨盒组装任务分析步骤所需的最少到最多提示水平的同时,最少到最多提示层次是否有效地提高了这些学生的工作效率。本研究采用多基线设计来分析最少到最多提示层级的实施效果。本研究结果表明,运用任务分析和最少到最多提示层次对智障个体的披萨盒组装技能具有较好的教学效果。本文还讨论了在向智障人士教授复杂职业任务时使用从最少到最多提示的任务分析的意义和建议,以及未来研究的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信