Tax Mediation – an Alternative to the Resolution of Disputes between Taxpayers and the Local Tax Administration

Dorin Sandu
{"title":"Tax Mediation – an Alternative to the Resolution of Disputes between Taxpayers and the Local Tax Administration","authors":"Dorin Sandu","doi":"10.51865/eitc.2021.03.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Local taxes and fees are of interest to both the public authorities and the taxpayer. The level of local taxes and fees guides the way the local budget is prepared and outlines the main investment objectives at the community level. The taxpayer has become increasingly interested in what he pays in local taxes and fees because he has realized that this effort on his part must be reflected in the level of well-being of the community in which he lives. This study aims at an analysis of tax mediation in Romania, as a distinct, special, and voluntary procedure between the tax institution and the debtor taxpayer, without the presence of the mediator as a third person, neutral and independent, comparing the institution of tax mediator in Romania with other EU countries presentation of the stages of mediation and its advantages in favor of both parties. The reality proves that there are numerous situations when fiscal administrative acts issued by the local taxes and fees service are the object of appeals before the issuing public authorities and the administrative-fiscal contentious courts. It complicates the activity of both local public authorities and courts, adds time consumption and financial costs, and fiscal mediation proves to be an optimal solution.","PeriodicalId":55648,"journal":{"name":"Economic Insights Trends and Challenges","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Insights Trends and Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51865/eitc.2021.03.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Local taxes and fees are of interest to both the public authorities and the taxpayer. The level of local taxes and fees guides the way the local budget is prepared and outlines the main investment objectives at the community level. The taxpayer has become increasingly interested in what he pays in local taxes and fees because he has realized that this effort on his part must be reflected in the level of well-being of the community in which he lives. This study aims at an analysis of tax mediation in Romania, as a distinct, special, and voluntary procedure between the tax institution and the debtor taxpayer, without the presence of the mediator as a third person, neutral and independent, comparing the institution of tax mediator in Romania with other EU countries presentation of the stages of mediation and its advantages in favor of both parties. The reality proves that there are numerous situations when fiscal administrative acts issued by the local taxes and fees service are the object of appeals before the issuing public authorities and the administrative-fiscal contentious courts. It complicates the activity of both local public authorities and courts, adds time consumption and financial costs, and fiscal mediation proves to be an optimal solution.
税收调解——纳税人与地税纠纷解决的另一种选择
地方税费是公共当局和纳税人共同关心的问题。地方税收和收费水平指导了地方预算的编制方式,并概述了社区一级的主要投资目标。纳税人越来越关心他所缴纳的地方税和费用,因为他意识到他的努力必须反映在他所居住的社区的福利水平上。本研究旨在分析罗马尼亚的税收调解,作为税务机构与债务人纳税人之间独特的、特殊的、自愿的程序,没有调解员作为第三人的存在,中立和独立,比较罗马尼亚的税收调解员制度与其他欧盟国家的调解阶段的呈现及其对双方有利的优势。现实证明,地方税费机关发布的财政行政行为在发布机关和行政-财政纠纷法院成为申诉对象的情况很多。它使地方公共当局和法院的活动复杂化,增加了时间消耗和财政成本,财政调解被证明是一种最佳解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信