Stigma, Confidentiality, and Blame: Qualitative Focus Groups of Ghanaian Obstetric Providers After Maternal and Perinatal Losses [ID: 1377293]

C. Russell, T. Beyuo, E. Lawrence, S. Oppong, R. Owusu-Antwi
{"title":"Stigma, Confidentiality, and Blame: Qualitative Focus Groups of Ghanaian Obstetric Providers After Maternal and Perinatal Losses [ID: 1377293]","authors":"C. Russell, T. Beyuo, E. Lawrence, S. Oppong, R. Owusu-Antwi","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000931000.56844.2d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Despite maternal and perinatal mortality disproportionately occurring in low- and middle-income countries, there are limited data on the emotional toll these losses have on obstetric providers. In a series of focus groups discussions (FGDs), this study delves into the experiences of physicians and midwives in Ghana after maternal and perinatal losses. METHODS: Participants were obstetrician/gynecologists and midwives at the two largest tertiary hospitals in Ghana. Five FGDs were conducted by a trained facilitator, using a semi-structured guide. Questions explored experiences after patient deaths and perspectives on supportive interventions for providers. FGDs were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Using an iteratively developed codebook, transcripts were thematically analyzed with NVivo. Written informed consent and IRB approvals were obtained. RESULTS: Twenty obstetricians and 32 midwives participated in five FGDs in Accra and Kumasi, Ghana. Most providers (84%) had completed training, and almost half (46%) had been in practice for above 10 years. Three major themes emerged: 1) pervasive stigma about seeking mental health services, especially from psychiatrists, rooted in cultural norms; 2) skepticism about departmental and peer confidentiality if providers seek support after poor outcomes; 3) profound sense of blame, both from self and peers, that resulted in poor mortality audit attendance and effects on workplace performance. Despite numerous barriers, providers expressed a strong need for improved departmental and institutional support systems. CONCLUSION: This study uncovers key barriers for providers to access mental health care and support after experiencing maternal and perinatal mortalities. Findings should inform interventions to better support struggling providers.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"59 1","pages":"83S - 83S"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000931000.56844.2d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite maternal and perinatal mortality disproportionately occurring in low- and middle-income countries, there are limited data on the emotional toll these losses have on obstetric providers. In a series of focus groups discussions (FGDs), this study delves into the experiences of physicians and midwives in Ghana after maternal and perinatal losses. METHODS: Participants were obstetrician/gynecologists and midwives at the two largest tertiary hospitals in Ghana. Five FGDs were conducted by a trained facilitator, using a semi-structured guide. Questions explored experiences after patient deaths and perspectives on supportive interventions for providers. FGDs were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Using an iteratively developed codebook, transcripts were thematically analyzed with NVivo. Written informed consent and IRB approvals were obtained. RESULTS: Twenty obstetricians and 32 midwives participated in five FGDs in Accra and Kumasi, Ghana. Most providers (84%) had completed training, and almost half (46%) had been in practice for above 10 years. Three major themes emerged: 1) pervasive stigma about seeking mental health services, especially from psychiatrists, rooted in cultural norms; 2) skepticism about departmental and peer confidentiality if providers seek support after poor outcomes; 3) profound sense of blame, both from self and peers, that resulted in poor mortality audit attendance and effects on workplace performance. Despite numerous barriers, providers expressed a strong need for improved departmental and institutional support systems. CONCLUSION: This study uncovers key barriers for providers to access mental health care and support after experiencing maternal and perinatal mortalities. Findings should inform interventions to better support struggling providers.
污名、保密和责任:加纳产科服务提供者在孕产妇和围产期损失后的定性焦点群体[j]
导言:尽管孕产妇和围产期死亡率不成比例地发生在低收入和中等收入国家,但关于这些损失对产科提供者造成的情感损失的数据有限。在一系列焦点小组讨论(fgd)中,本研究深入研究了加纳的医生和助产士在孕产妇和围产期损失后的经验。方法:参与者是加纳两家最大的三级医院的产科医生/妇科医生和助产士。五项fgd是由一名训练有素的协调人使用半结构化指南进行的。问题探讨了病人死亡后的经历和对提供者的支持性干预的看法。录音和逐字抄写fgd。使用迭代开发的代码本,用NVivo对转录本进行主题分析。获得书面知情同意和IRB批准。结果:20名产科医生和32名助产士参加了加纳阿克拉和库马西的5次fgd。大多数医疗服务提供者(84%)完成了培训,近一半(46%)的从业时间超过10年。出现了三个主要主题:1)根深蒂固的文化规范导致人们普遍对寻求心理健康服务(尤其是精神科医生)感到耻辱;2)如果提供者在结果不佳后寻求支持,对部门和同行保密持怀疑态度;3)强烈的自责感,包括来自自己和同事的自责,这导致了低死亡率审计出勤率和对工作绩效的影响。尽管有许多障碍,提供者表示强烈需要改进部门和机构支助系统。结论:本研究揭示了服务提供者在经历孕产妇和围产期死亡后获得精神卫生保健和支持的主要障碍。调查结果应该为干预措施提供信息,以更好地支持陷入困境的提供者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信