S. Marconcini, E. Giammarinaro, S. Cosola, Chiara Giampietro, A. Genovesi, U. Covani, O. Giampietro
{"title":"Bruxism and Cardio Vascular Diseases: a cross-sectional study","authors":"S. Marconcini, E. Giammarinaro, S. Cosola, Chiara Giampietro, A. Genovesi, U. Covani, O. Giampietro","doi":"10.17554/J.ISSN.2309-6861.2018.05.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Bruxism is a parafunctional activity with unclear etiology. Psychological stress might be involved. The aim of this observational study was to compare the prevalence of bruxism between cardiopathic patients and non-cardiopathic patients. Subjects and methods: The population study was based on 120 patients divided in 2 groups: Cardiopathic patients (Test-group; n=60) and Non-Cardiopathic patients (Control-group; n=60). All the patients included in the study were screened for bruxism with the “tooth wear Index” (TWI). The TWI value was supposed to be higher or equal to 2 for the 50% of the teeth to define the diagnosis of bruxism. The prevalence of bruxism was calculated and compared in both groups. Results: In the Test-group, 55 out of 60 cardiopathic patients were bruxist, with a prevalence of 91,67%. In the Control-group, 17 out of 60 non cardiopathic patients were bruxist with a prevalence of 28,33%. (Table-3) Conclusion: Cardiopathic patients showed a higher prevalence of bruxism than non-cardiopathic patients. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the relation occurring between the two conditions.","PeriodicalId":92802,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy","volume":"62 1","pages":"734-737"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17554/J.ISSN.2309-6861.2018.05.155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Introduction: Bruxism is a parafunctional activity with unclear etiology. Psychological stress might be involved. The aim of this observational study was to compare the prevalence of bruxism between cardiopathic patients and non-cardiopathic patients. Subjects and methods: The population study was based on 120 patients divided in 2 groups: Cardiopathic patients (Test-group; n=60) and Non-Cardiopathic patients (Control-group; n=60). All the patients included in the study were screened for bruxism with the “tooth wear Index” (TWI). The TWI value was supposed to be higher or equal to 2 for the 50% of the teeth to define the diagnosis of bruxism. The prevalence of bruxism was calculated and compared in both groups. Results: In the Test-group, 55 out of 60 cardiopathic patients were bruxist, with a prevalence of 91,67%. In the Control-group, 17 out of 60 non cardiopathic patients were bruxist with a prevalence of 28,33%. (Table-3) Conclusion: Cardiopathic patients showed a higher prevalence of bruxism than non-cardiopathic patients. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the relation occurring between the two conditions.