Validity and Reliability of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Test Assessment in Mathematics Learning At Seventh Grade Based on The Expert Study

Resvia Subay, Kartono Kartono, S. Sulhadi
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Test Assessment in Mathematics Learning At Seventh Grade Based on The Expert Study","authors":"Resvia Subay, Kartono Kartono, S. Sulhadi","doi":"10.15294/jere.v8i2.38790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a part of research and development that develops Higher Order Thinking Skill test assessment in mathematics learning in seventh grade. The developed test assessment is in the form of essay questions, consisting of 10 question items. In a research and development study, one of the required steps before conducting a trial run test is an expert study. The expert study is carried out to find out the validity and reliability of a developed instrument based on experts' judgment. The developed test assessment in this research is based on three experts' judgments. They are a mathematician, an evaluation expert, and a practitioner (mathematics teacher). Then, the scores taken from the expert study were then analyzed by using the Aiken formula. Meanwhile, the reliability was analyzed by using Ebel. The validity score of 10 question items shows each of them has a validity score toward three aspects. The aspects are content, construct, and language. The aspects consist of 14 principles. Meanwhile, the reliability test has a score . Thus, the developed test assessment, based on the expert study, is valid and reliable.","PeriodicalId":30816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v8i2.38790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper is a part of research and development that develops Higher Order Thinking Skill test assessment in mathematics learning in seventh grade. The developed test assessment is in the form of essay questions, consisting of 10 question items. In a research and development study, one of the required steps before conducting a trial run test is an expert study. The expert study is carried out to find out the validity and reliability of a developed instrument based on experts' judgment. The developed test assessment in this research is based on three experts' judgments. They are a mathematician, an evaluation expert, and a practitioner (mathematics teacher). Then, the scores taken from the expert study were then analyzed by using the Aiken formula. Meanwhile, the reliability was analyzed by using Ebel. The validity score of 10 question items shows each of them has a validity score toward three aspects. The aspects are content, construct, and language. The aspects consist of 14 principles. Meanwhile, the reliability test has a score . Thus, the developed test assessment, based on the expert study, is valid and reliable.
基于专家研究的七年级数学学习高阶思维技能(HOTS)测试评价的效度与信度
本文是七年级数学学习高阶思维技能测试评价研究开发的一部分。开发出的考试评价是由10个题目组成的论述题。在研究和开发研究中,在进行试运行测试之前的必要步骤之一是进行专家研究。在专家判断的基础上,进行专家研究,以确定所开发的仪器的效度和信度。本研究开发的测试评估是基于三位专家的判断。他们是数学家,是评估专家,是实践者(数学老师)。然后,从专家研究中获得的分数,然后使用艾肯公式进行分析。同时,用Ebel法进行了信度分析。10个题项的效度得分显示每个题项都有三个方面的效度得分。这三个方面是内容、结构和语言。这些方面包括14条原则。同时,信度测试有一个分数。因此,在专家研究的基础上开发的测试评估是有效和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书