Ethical Barriers to Perinatal Mental Health Research and Evidence-Based Treatment: An Empirical Study

A. Brandon
{"title":"Ethical Barriers to Perinatal Mental Health Research and Evidence-Based Treatment: An Empirical Study","authors":"A. Brandon","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2011.561517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although more than 500,000 women annually experience a psychiatric illness during pregnancy, and approximately 30% will be prescribed medication, no psychotropic medications are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use during pregnancy. In the absence of an evidence base, investigators, clinicians, and patients are concerned that we are “operating in a vast sea of ignorance.” International pregnancy registries and observational studies exist, but there are few randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the gold standard of evidence-based medicine, due to the fear of fetal harm, even in non-pharmacological research. Current research guidelines reflect the ambivalence of regulatory agencies regarding pregnant research participants and use ambiguous language unhelpful to institutional review boards (IRBs), leaving perinatal women the last “therapeutic orphans.” This is a review of the issues as identified by perinatal investigators and a proposal to draft new collaborative guidelines to facilitate perinatal mental health research necessary for empirically-based treatment.","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"3 1","pages":"12 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.561517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Although more than 500,000 women annually experience a psychiatric illness during pregnancy, and approximately 30% will be prescribed medication, no psychotropic medications are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use during pregnancy. In the absence of an evidence base, investigators, clinicians, and patients are concerned that we are “operating in a vast sea of ignorance.” International pregnancy registries and observational studies exist, but there are few randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the gold standard of evidence-based medicine, due to the fear of fetal harm, even in non-pharmacological research. Current research guidelines reflect the ambivalence of regulatory agencies regarding pregnant research participants and use ambiguous language unhelpful to institutional review boards (IRBs), leaving perinatal women the last “therapeutic orphans.” This is a review of the issues as identified by perinatal investigators and a proposal to draft new collaborative guidelines to facilitate perinatal mental health research necessary for empirically-based treatment.
围产期心理健康研究的伦理障碍及循证治疗:实证研究
尽管每年有超过50万的女性在怀孕期间患有精神疾病,其中约30%的人会接受处方药治疗,但美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)没有批准在怀孕期间使用精神药物。在缺乏证据基础的情况下,研究人员、临床医生和患者都担心我们“在一片无知的海洋中工作”。国际妊娠登记和观察性研究已经存在,但由于对胎儿伤害的恐惧,即使在非药理学研究中,也很少有随机对照试验(rct),这是循证医学的黄金标准。目前的研究指南反映了监管机构对怀孕研究参与者的矛盾心理,并且使用了对机构审查委员会(irb)没有帮助的模糊语言,使围产期妇女成为最后的“治疗孤儿”。这是对围产期调查人员确定的问题的审查,并建议起草新的合作指南,以促进围产期心理健康研究,这是基于经验的治疗所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信