The Combination of Sufentanil and Remifentanil on Hemodynamic Changes during Anesthetic Induction and Endotracheal Intubation

Huang Qian, Zhang Le, Mou Yan, Tang Yixun, Kong Gaoyin, W. Lai, Z. Yi
{"title":"The Combination of Sufentanil and Remifentanil on Hemodynamic Changes during Anesthetic Induction and Endotracheal Intubation","authors":"Huang Qian, Zhang Le, Mou Yan, Tang Yixun, Kong Gaoyin, W. Lai, Z. Yi","doi":"10.36959/377/362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The of and on Hemodynamic Changes during Anesthetic Induction and Intubation. Abstract Introduction: A low dose of sufentanil was insufficient to suppress endotracheal intubation (ETI) induced cardiovascular response. This study investigated the effects of combined sufentanil and remifentanil on hemodynamic changes during anesthetic induction and ETI. Methods: 70 adult patients were divided into two groups (n = 35). General anesthesia was induced by sufentanil, propofol, and cisatracurium. Group S received sufentanil 0.3 mcg/kg, while Group R received sufentanil 0.3 mcg/kg and remifentanil 1 mcg/kg. The systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR), incidence and severity of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia, doses of propofol during anesthetic induction and ETI were compared. Results: After anesthetic induction, the changes of SAP, DAP, MAP and HR were comparable between the groups ( p > 0.05). Right after ETI, the HR in Group R was significantly lower than Group S ( p < 0.001). 5 min after ETI, the SAP, DAP, and MAP in Group R was significantly higher than Group S ( p < 0.03). The incidence and severity of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia was comparable between the groups ( p > 0.07). The dose of propofol used in Group R was significantly lower than Group S ( p = 0.001). and remifentanil is superior to sufentanil alone for attenuating ETI induced cardiovascular response without cardiovascular compromise.","PeriodicalId":92399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical anesthesia and pain management","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical anesthesia and pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/377/362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The of and on Hemodynamic Changes during Anesthetic Induction and Intubation. Abstract Introduction: A low dose of sufentanil was insufficient to suppress endotracheal intubation (ETI) induced cardiovascular response. This study investigated the effects of combined sufentanil and remifentanil on hemodynamic changes during anesthetic induction and ETI. Methods: 70 adult patients were divided into two groups (n = 35). General anesthesia was induced by sufentanil, propofol, and cisatracurium. Group S received sufentanil 0.3 mcg/kg, while Group R received sufentanil 0.3 mcg/kg and remifentanil 1 mcg/kg. The systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR), incidence and severity of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia, doses of propofol during anesthetic induction and ETI were compared. Results: After anesthetic induction, the changes of SAP, DAP, MAP and HR were comparable between the groups ( p > 0.05). Right after ETI, the HR in Group R was significantly lower than Group S ( p < 0.001). 5 min after ETI, the SAP, DAP, and MAP in Group R was significantly higher than Group S ( p < 0.03). The incidence and severity of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia was comparable between the groups ( p > 0.07). The dose of propofol used in Group R was significantly lower than Group S ( p = 0.001). and remifentanil is superior to sufentanil alone for attenuating ETI induced cardiovascular response without cardiovascular compromise.
舒芬太尼与瑞芬太尼联用对麻醉诱导及气管插管血流动力学的影响
麻醉诱导和插管过程中血流动力学变化的研究。摘要简介:小剂量舒芬太尼不足以抑制气管插管(ETI)诱导的心血管反应。本研究探讨舒芬太尼和瑞芬太尼联合应用对麻醉诱导和ETI过程中血流动力学变化的影响。方法:70例成人患者分为两组(n = 35)。全身麻醉由舒芬太尼、异丙酚和顺阿曲库铵诱导。S组给予舒芬太尼0.3 mcg/kg, R组给予舒芬太尼0.3 mcg/kg,瑞芬太尼1 mcg/kg。比较麻醉诱导和ETI期间的收缩压(SAP)、舒张压(DAP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、低血压、高血压、心动过缓、心动过速的发生率和严重程度、异丙酚剂量。结果:麻醉诱导后,两组间SAP、DAP、MAP、HR变化具有可比性(p < 0.05)。ETI后,R组的HR显著低于S组(p < 0.001)。ETI后5 min, R组SAP、DAP、MAP均显著高于S组(p < 0.03)。两组间低血压、高血压、心动过缓和心动过速的发生率和严重程度相当(p < 0.07)。R组异丙酚使用剂量显著低于S组(p = 0.001)。瑞芬太尼在减轻ETI诱导的心血管反应方面优于单独使用舒芬太尼而不损害心血管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信