Serratia marcescens shapes cutaneous bacterial communities and influences survival of an amphibian host

Joseph D. Madison, S. Ouellette, E. L. Schmidt, J. Kerby
{"title":"Serratia marcescens shapes cutaneous bacterial communities and influences survival of an amphibian host","authors":"Joseph D. Madison, S. Ouellette, E. L. Schmidt, J. Kerby","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2019.1833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ongoing investigations into the interactions between microbial communities and their associated hosts are changing how emerging diseases are perceived and ameliorated. Of the numerous host–microbiome–disease systems of study, the emergence of chytridiomycosis (caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, hereafter Bd) has been implicated in ongoing declines and extinction events of amphibians worldwide. Interestingly, there has been differential survival among amphibians in resisting Bd infection and subsequent disease. One factor thought to contribute to this resistance is the host-associated cutaneous microbiota. This has raised the possibility of using genetically modified probiotics to restructure the host-associated microbiota for desired anti-fungal outcomes. Here, we use a previously described strain of Serratia marcescens (Sm) for the manipulation of amphibian cutaneous microbiota. Sm was genetically altered to have a dysfunctional pathway for the production of the extracellular metabolite prodigiosin. This genetically altered strain (Δpig) and the functional prodigiosin producing strain (wild-type, WT) were compared for their microbial community and anti-Bd effects both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, Bd growth was significantly repressed in the presence of prodigiosin. In vivo, the inoculation of both Sm strains was shown to significantly influence amphibian microbiota diversity with the Δpig-Sm treatment showing increasing alpha diversity, and the WT-Sm having no temporal effect on diversity. Differences were also seen in host mortality with Δpig-Sm treatments exhibiting significantly decreased survival probability when compared with WT-Sm in the presence of Bd. These results are an important proof-of-concept for linking the use of genetically modified probiotic bacteria to host microbial community structure and disease outcomes, which in the future may provide a way to ameliorate disease and address critical frontiers in disease and microbial ecology.","PeriodicalId":20609,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Ongoing investigations into the interactions between microbial communities and their associated hosts are changing how emerging diseases are perceived and ameliorated. Of the numerous host–microbiome–disease systems of study, the emergence of chytridiomycosis (caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, hereafter Bd) has been implicated in ongoing declines and extinction events of amphibians worldwide. Interestingly, there has been differential survival among amphibians in resisting Bd infection and subsequent disease. One factor thought to contribute to this resistance is the host-associated cutaneous microbiota. This has raised the possibility of using genetically modified probiotics to restructure the host-associated microbiota for desired anti-fungal outcomes. Here, we use a previously described strain of Serratia marcescens (Sm) for the manipulation of amphibian cutaneous microbiota. Sm was genetically altered to have a dysfunctional pathway for the production of the extracellular metabolite prodigiosin. This genetically altered strain (Δpig) and the functional prodigiosin producing strain (wild-type, WT) were compared for their microbial community and anti-Bd effects both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, Bd growth was significantly repressed in the presence of prodigiosin. In vivo, the inoculation of both Sm strains was shown to significantly influence amphibian microbiota diversity with the Δpig-Sm treatment showing increasing alpha diversity, and the WT-Sm having no temporal effect on diversity. Differences were also seen in host mortality with Δpig-Sm treatments exhibiting significantly decreased survival probability when compared with WT-Sm in the presence of Bd. These results are an important proof-of-concept for linking the use of genetically modified probiotic bacteria to host microbial community structure and disease outcomes, which in the future may provide a way to ameliorate disease and address critical frontiers in disease and microbial ecology.
粘质沙雷氏菌形成皮肤细菌群落并影响两栖动物宿主的生存
正在进行的对微生物群落及其相关宿主之间相互作用的调查正在改变人们对新发疾病的认识和改善方式。在众多正在研究的宿主-微生物群疾病系统中,壶菌病(由壶菌引起,以下简称Bd)的出现与世界范围内两栖动物数量的持续下降和灭绝事件有关。有趣的是,在抵抗Bd感染和随后的疾病方面,两栖动物的存活率存在差异。一个被认为有助于这种抵抗的因素是与宿主相关的皮肤微生物群。这提高了使用转基因益生菌重组宿主相关微生物群以获得所需抗真菌效果的可能性。在这里,我们使用先前描述的粘质沙雷氏菌(Sm)菌株来操纵两栖动物皮肤微生物群。Sm在基因上发生了改变,使其产生细胞外代谢物prodigiosin的途径发生了功能障碍。将该基因改造菌株(Δpig)与功能产prodigiosin菌株(野生型,WT)的微生物群落和体内体外抗bd效果进行了比较。在体外实验中,芥蓝菌的生长明显受到抑制。在体内,接种两种Sm菌株均能显著影响两栖动物微生物群的多样性,其中Δpig-Sm处理能增加α多样性,WT-Sm对多样性没有时间影响。与存在Bd的WT-Sm相比,Δpig-Sm处理的宿主死亡率也存在差异,表现出显著降低的生存概率。这些结果为将转基因益生菌的使用与宿主微生物群落结构和疾病结局联系起来提供了重要的概念证明,这在未来可能为改善疾病和解决疾病和微生物生态学的关键前沿提供了一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信