Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion: Does it still have a role?

J. Reid, Michael Rooke, Colin Hawksmith, C. Jurisevic, M. Brown, S. Neuhaus
{"title":"Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion: Does it still have a role?","authors":"J. Reid, Michael Rooke, Colin Hawksmith, C. Jurisevic, M. Brown, S. Neuhaus","doi":"10.4103/VIT.VIT_18_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic-isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan is an established modality for the treatment of irresectable malignancy of an extremity, including melanoma. ILP isolates the affected limb from the systemic circulation, using an extracorporeal bypass circuit, and administering high-dose intra-arterial chemotherapy. While this technique remains the “gold standard” and is practiced at high-volume surgical oncology centers worldwide, as new systemic treatments have become available, it is timely to review the current place of regional chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six ILPs were performed between 2006 and 2013 at a single center. Patient's parameters, clinical outcomes, and survival were evaluated. Twenty procedures were for melanoma, five for sarcoma, and one for extensive basal cell carcinoma (BCC). RESULTS: ILP was well tolerated with few intraoperative or postoperative complications. Within the melanoma group, limb toxicities were low with one Grade III and no severe (Wieberdink IV+) toxicities. Limb salvage was achieved in 2/5 sarcoma patients. At 6 weeks' postprocedure, 13 melanomas, two sarcomas, and the BCC patient reported a complete response (16/26). However, 5 years after the last procedure, and a median follow-up of 23 months, the majority of melanoma and all sarcoma patients went on to develop local recurrence or metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: ILP is a useful technique to provide high-dose chemotherapy to refractory limb malignancy to provide effective palliation, delay progression, or even obtain cure. However, as new effective systemic therapies emerge, the role of isolated regional chemotherapy (ILP and isolated limb infusion) needs to be reevaluated.","PeriodicalId":34849,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Investigation and Therapy","volume":"15 1","pages":"87 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Investigation and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/VIT.VIT_18_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic-isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan is an established modality for the treatment of irresectable malignancy of an extremity, including melanoma. ILP isolates the affected limb from the systemic circulation, using an extracorporeal bypass circuit, and administering high-dose intra-arterial chemotherapy. While this technique remains the “gold standard” and is practiced at high-volume surgical oncology centers worldwide, as new systemic treatments have become available, it is timely to review the current place of regional chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six ILPs were performed between 2006 and 2013 at a single center. Patient's parameters, clinical outcomes, and survival were evaluated. Twenty procedures were for melanoma, five for sarcoma, and one for extensive basal cell carcinoma (BCC). RESULTS: ILP was well tolerated with few intraoperative or postoperative complications. Within the melanoma group, limb toxicities were low with one Grade III and no severe (Wieberdink IV+) toxicities. Limb salvage was achieved in 2/5 sarcoma patients. At 6 weeks' postprocedure, 13 melanomas, two sarcomas, and the BCC patient reported a complete response (16/26). However, 5 years after the last procedure, and a median follow-up of 23 months, the majority of melanoma and all sarcoma patients went on to develop local recurrence or metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: ILP is a useful technique to provide high-dose chemotherapy to refractory limb malignancy to provide effective palliation, delay progression, or even obtain cure. However, as new effective systemic therapies emerge, the role of isolated regional chemotherapy (ILP and isolated limb infusion) needs to be reevaluated.
离体肢体热灌注:是否仍有作用?
背景:melphalan热隔离肢体灌注(ILP)是一种治疗包括黑色素瘤在内的不可切除的肢体恶性肿瘤的方法。ILP将患病肢体与体循环分离,使用体外旁路循环,并给予高剂量动脉内化疗。虽然这种技术仍然是“金标准”,并在世界范围内的高容量外科肿瘤中心进行实践,但随着新的全身治疗方法的出现,对局部化疗的现状进行审查是及时的。患者和方法:2006年至2013年在单个中心进行了26例ilp。评估患者的参数、临床结果和生存率。其中20例为黑色素瘤,5例为肉瘤,1例为广泛基底细胞癌。结果:ILP患者耐受性良好,术中及术后并发症少。在黑色素瘤组中,肢体毒性较低,有1例III级,无严重(Wieberdink IV+)毒性。2/5的肉瘤患者获得肢体保留。术后6周,13例黑色素瘤、2例肉瘤和BCC患者报告完全缓解(16/26)。然而,在最后一次手术5年后,中位随访23个月,大多数黑色素瘤和所有肉瘤患者继续发展为局部复发或转移性疾病。结论:ILP是提供高剂量化疗治疗难治性肢体恶性肿瘤的有用技术,可提供有效的缓解,延缓进展,甚至获得治愈。然而,随着新的有效的全身治疗方法的出现,孤立的局部化疗(ILP和孤立的肢体输注)的作用需要重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书