Host country employees’ negative perceptions of successive expatriate leadership: the role of leadership transference and implicit leadership theories

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT
S. Ciuk, Doris Schedlitzki
{"title":"Host country employees’ negative perceptions of successive expatriate leadership: the role of leadership transference and implicit leadership theories","authors":"S. Ciuk, Doris Schedlitzki","doi":"10.1108/jgm-04-2021-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeDrawing on socio-cognitively orientated leadership studies, this paper aims to contribute to our understanding of host country employees’ (HCEs) negative perceptions of successive expatriate leadership by exploring how their memories of shared past experiences affect these perceptions. Contrary to previous work which tends to focus on HCEs’ attitudes towards individual expatriates, the authors shift attention to successive executive expatriate assignments within a single subsidiary.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on an intrinsic case study carried out in a Polish subsidiary of an American multinational pharmaceutical company which had been managed by four successive expatriate General Managers and one local executive. The authors draw on interview data with 40 HCEs. Twenty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff who had been managed by at least three of the subsidiary’s expatriate leaders.FindingsThe authors demonstrate how transference triggered by past experiences with expatriate leaders as well as HCEs’ implicit leadership theories affect HCEs’ negative perceptions of expatriate leadership and lead to the emergence of expatriate leadership schema.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that explores the role of transference and implicit leadership theories in HCEs’ perceptions of successive executive expatriate assignments. By focussing on retrospective accounts of HCEs who had been managed by a series of successive expatriate leaders, our study has generated a more nuanced and contextualised understanding of the role of HCEs’ shared past experiences in shaping their perceptions of expatriate leadership. The authors propose a new concept – expatriate leadership schema – which describes HCEs’ cognitive structures, developed during past experiences with successive expatriate leaders, which specify what HCEs believe expatriate leadership to look like and what they expect from it.","PeriodicalId":44863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Mobility-The Home of Expatriate Management Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Mobility-The Home of Expatriate Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgm-04-2021-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeDrawing on socio-cognitively orientated leadership studies, this paper aims to contribute to our understanding of host country employees’ (HCEs) negative perceptions of successive expatriate leadership by exploring how their memories of shared past experiences affect these perceptions. Contrary to previous work which tends to focus on HCEs’ attitudes towards individual expatriates, the authors shift attention to successive executive expatriate assignments within a single subsidiary.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on an intrinsic case study carried out in a Polish subsidiary of an American multinational pharmaceutical company which had been managed by four successive expatriate General Managers and one local executive. The authors draw on interview data with 40 HCEs. Twenty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff who had been managed by at least three of the subsidiary’s expatriate leaders.FindingsThe authors demonstrate how transference triggered by past experiences with expatriate leaders as well as HCEs’ implicit leadership theories affect HCEs’ negative perceptions of expatriate leadership and lead to the emergence of expatriate leadership schema.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that explores the role of transference and implicit leadership theories in HCEs’ perceptions of successive executive expatriate assignments. By focussing on retrospective accounts of HCEs who had been managed by a series of successive expatriate leaders, our study has generated a more nuanced and contextualised understanding of the role of HCEs’ shared past experiences in shaping their perceptions of expatriate leadership. The authors propose a new concept – expatriate leadership schema – which describes HCEs’ cognitive structures, developed during past experiences with successive expatriate leaders, which specify what HCEs believe expatriate leadership to look like and what they expect from it.
东道国员工对连续外派领导的负面认知:领导迁移和内隐领导理论的作用
目的:利用社会认知导向的领导力研究,本文旨在通过探索东道国员工对共同经历的记忆如何影响这些认知,来帮助我们理解东道国员工(HCEs)对连续外籍领导的负面看法。以往的工作往往侧重于高级别主管对个别外派人员的态度,与此相反,作者将注意力转移到单个子公司内连续的行政外派人员派遣。设计/方法/方法本文基于在一家美国跨国制药公司的波兰子公司进行的内部案例研究,该子公司由四位连续的外籍总经理和一位当地高管管理。作者利用了对40位高收入者的采访数据。对工作人员进行了21次半结构化访谈,这些工作人员至少由该子公司的三名外籍领导人管理。研究结果表明,与外籍领导的过往经历以及高情商人士的内隐领导理论引发的移情如何影响高情商人士对外籍领导的负面看法,并导致外籍领导图式的出现。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一个探讨移情和内隐领导理论在高智商高管对连续外派高管的看法中所起作用的研究。通过对历任外籍高管管理过的高企高管的回顾性分析,我们的研究对高企高管过去的共同经历在塑造他们对外籍高管领导的看法方面所起的作用有了更细致和背景化的理解。作者提出了一个新的概念——外派领导模式——它描述了hce的认知结构,这是在过去与连续的外派领导人的经历中形成的,它明确了hce认为的外派领导是什么样子的,以及他们对外派领导的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信