Better-Than-Worst-Case Design Methodology for a Compact Integrated Switched-Capacitor DC-DC Converter

Dongkwun Kim, Mingoo Seok
{"title":"Better-Than-Worst-Case Design Methodology for a Compact Integrated Switched-Capacitor DC-DC Converter","authors":"Dongkwun Kim, Mingoo Seok","doi":"10.1145/3218603.3218610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We suggest a new methodology in co-designing an integrated switched-capacitor converter and a digital load. Conventionally, a load has been specified to the minimum supply voltage and the maximum power dissipation, each found at her own worst-case process, workload, and environment condition. Furthermore, in designing an SC DC-DC converter toward this worst-case load specification, designers often have been adding another separate pessimistic assumption on power-switch's resistance and flying-capacitor's density of an SC converter. Such worst-case design methodology can lead to a significantly over-sized flying capacitor and thereby limit on-chip integration of a converter. Our proposed methodology instead adopts the better than worst-case (BTWC) perspective to avoid over-design and thus optimizes the area of an SC converter. Specifically, we propose BTWC load modeling where we specify non-pessimistic sets of supply voltage requirement and load power dissipation across variations. In addition, by considering coupled variations between the SC converter and the load integrated in the same die, our methodology can further reduce the pessimism in power-switch's resistance and capacitor density. The proposed co-design methodology is verified with a 2:1 SC converter and a digital load in a 65 nm. The resulted converter achieves more than one order of magnitude reduction in the flying capacitor size as compared to the conventional worst-case design while maintaining the target conversion efficiency and target throughput. We also verified our methodology with a wide range of load characteristics in terms of their supply voltages and current draw and confirmed the similar benefits.","PeriodicalId":20456,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Low power electronics and design (ISLPED '07)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Low power electronics and design (ISLPED '07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3218603.3218610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We suggest a new methodology in co-designing an integrated switched-capacitor converter and a digital load. Conventionally, a load has been specified to the minimum supply voltage and the maximum power dissipation, each found at her own worst-case process, workload, and environment condition. Furthermore, in designing an SC DC-DC converter toward this worst-case load specification, designers often have been adding another separate pessimistic assumption on power-switch's resistance and flying-capacitor's density of an SC converter. Such worst-case design methodology can lead to a significantly over-sized flying capacitor and thereby limit on-chip integration of a converter. Our proposed methodology instead adopts the better than worst-case (BTWC) perspective to avoid over-design and thus optimizes the area of an SC converter. Specifically, we propose BTWC load modeling where we specify non-pessimistic sets of supply voltage requirement and load power dissipation across variations. In addition, by considering coupled variations between the SC converter and the load integrated in the same die, our methodology can further reduce the pessimism in power-switch's resistance and capacitor density. The proposed co-design methodology is verified with a 2:1 SC converter and a digital load in a 65 nm. The resulted converter achieves more than one order of magnitude reduction in the flying capacitor size as compared to the conventional worst-case design while maintaining the target conversion efficiency and target throughput. We also verified our methodology with a wide range of load characteristics in terms of their supply voltages and current draw and confirmed the similar benefits.
紧凑型集成开关电容DC-DC变换器优于最坏情况的设计方法
我们提出了一种集成开关电容变换器和数字负载协同设计的新方法。传统上,负载被指定为最小电源电压和最大功耗,每个负载都在其自己的最坏情况下,工作负载和环境条件下找到。此外,在设计SC DC-DC变换器时,设计人员通常会对SC变换器的电源开关电阻和飞行电容器密度增加另一个单独的悲观假设。这种最坏情况下的设计方法可以导致一个显着过大的飞行电容器,从而限制片上集成的转换器。我们提出的方法采用比最坏情况(BTWC)更好的角度来避免过度设计,从而优化SC变换器的面积。具体来说,我们提出了BTWC负载建模,其中我们指定了非悲观的电源电压要求集和跨变量的负载功耗。此外,通过考虑SC变换器和集成在同一芯片中的负载之间的耦合变化,我们的方法可以进一步降低对功率开关电阻和电容器密度的悲观情绪。采用2:1 SC变换器和65nm的数字负载验证了所提出的协同设计方法。与传统的最坏情况设计相比,所得到的变换器在保持目标转换效率和目标吞吐量的同时,飞行电容器尺寸减少了一个数量级以上。我们还在电源电压和电流消耗方面对我们的方法进行了广泛的负载特性验证,并证实了类似的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信