Performance-based Social Comparisons in Humans and Long-tailed Macaques

Stefanie Keupp, Farhan Abedin, Lena Jeanson, C. Kade, Josefine Kalbitz, R. Titchener, T. Mussweiler, T. Bugnyar, J. Fischer
{"title":"Performance-based Social Comparisons in Humans and Long-tailed Macaques","authors":"Stefanie Keupp, Farhan Abedin, Lena Jeanson, C. Kade, Josefine Kalbitz, R. Titchener, T. Mussweiler, T. Bugnyar, J. Fischer","doi":"10.26451/abc.08.03.02.2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social comparisons are a fundamental feature of human thinking and affect self-evaluations and task performance. Little is known about the evolutionary origins of social comparison processes, however. Previous studies that investigated performance-based social comparisons in nonhuman primates yielded mixed results. We report three experiments that aimed (a) to explore how the task type may contribute to performance in monkeys, and (b) how a competitive set-up affects monkeys compared to humans. In a co-action touchscreen task, monkeys were neither influenced by nor interested in the performance of the partner. This may indicate that the experimental set-up was not sufficiently relevant to trigger social comparisons. In a novel co-action foraging task, monkeys increased their feeding speed in competitive and co-active conditions, but not in relation to the degree of competition. In an analogue of the foraging task, human participants were affected by partner performance and experimental context, indicating that the task is suitable to elicit social comparisons in humans. Our studies indicate that specifics of task and experimental setting are relevant to draw the monkeys’ attention to a co-actor and that, in line with previous research, a competitive element was crucial. We highlight the need to explore what constitutes “relevant” social comparison situations for monkeys as well as nonhuman animals in general, and point out factors that we think are crucial in this respect (e.g., task type, physical closeness, and the species’ ecology). We discuss that early forms of social comparisons evolved in purely competitive environments with increasing social tolerance and cooperative motivations allowing for more fine-grained processing of social information. Competition driven effects on task performance might constitute the foundation for the more elaborate social comparison processes found in humans, which may involve context-dependent information processing and metacognitive monitoring.","PeriodicalId":31700,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behavior and Cognition","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behavior and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.08.03.02.2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social comparisons are a fundamental feature of human thinking and affect self-evaluations and task performance. Little is known about the evolutionary origins of social comparison processes, however. Previous studies that investigated performance-based social comparisons in nonhuman primates yielded mixed results. We report three experiments that aimed (a) to explore how the task type may contribute to performance in monkeys, and (b) how a competitive set-up affects monkeys compared to humans. In a co-action touchscreen task, monkeys were neither influenced by nor interested in the performance of the partner. This may indicate that the experimental set-up was not sufficiently relevant to trigger social comparisons. In a novel co-action foraging task, monkeys increased their feeding speed in competitive and co-active conditions, but not in relation to the degree of competition. In an analogue of the foraging task, human participants were affected by partner performance and experimental context, indicating that the task is suitable to elicit social comparisons in humans. Our studies indicate that specifics of task and experimental setting are relevant to draw the monkeys’ attention to a co-actor and that, in line with previous research, a competitive element was crucial. We highlight the need to explore what constitutes “relevant” social comparison situations for monkeys as well as nonhuman animals in general, and point out factors that we think are crucial in this respect (e.g., task type, physical closeness, and the species’ ecology). We discuss that early forms of social comparisons evolved in purely competitive environments with increasing social tolerance and cooperative motivations allowing for more fine-grained processing of social information. Competition driven effects on task performance might constitute the foundation for the more elaborate social comparison processes found in humans, which may involve context-dependent information processing and metacognitive monitoring.
人类和长尾猕猴基于表现的社会比较
社会比较是人类思维的基本特征,影响自我评价和任务绩效。然而,人们对社会比较过程的进化起源知之甚少。先前对非人灵长类动物基于表现的社会比较的研究得出了不同的结果。我们报告了三个实验,旨在(a)探索任务类型如何影响猴子的表现,以及(b)与人类相比,竞争环境如何影响猴子。在互动触屏任务中,猴子既不受同伴表现的影响,也不感兴趣。这可能表明实验设置不足以引发社会比较。在一项新的合作觅食任务中,猴子在竞争和合作条件下增加了进食速度,但与竞争程度无关。在一个类似的觅食任务中,人类参与者受到同伴表现和实验环境的影响,这表明该任务适合引发人类的社会比较。我们的研究表明,具体的任务和实验环境与吸引猴子对合作者的注意力有关,与之前的研究一致,竞争因素是至关重要的。我们强调有必要探索什么构成了猴子和一般非人类动物的“相关”社会比较情境,并指出我们认为在这方面至关重要的因素(例如,任务类型、身体亲密度和物种生态)。我们讨论了早期形式的社会比较是在纯粹的竞争环境中进化而来的,随着社会宽容和合作动机的增加,社会信息的处理变得更加精细。竞争驱动对任务表现的影响可能构成了人类更复杂的社会比较过程的基础,这可能涉及情境依赖的信息处理和元认知监控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书