Fazlur Rahman's Perspective on Hadith Critical Reposition

M. Gufron, Fazlur Rahman
{"title":"Fazlur Rahman's Perspective on Hadith Critical Reposition","authors":"M. Gufron, Fazlur Rahman","doi":"10.18326/mlt.v7i1.7138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fazlur Rahman is an insider who has critical ideas about hadith. The reason is that there is a very long interval between the time of the Prophet Muhammad SAW. with the bookkeeping of hadith, as well as debatable about the concept of sunnah-hadith that is still not finished yet. The method used in this research is descriptive-analysis with a hermeneutic approach. According to Rahman, there is a fundamental difference between the definition of sunnah and hadith. Sunnah is a living tradition in society while hadith is a reportage of sunnah. This research is used library research, namely documentation data. The researcher uses descriptive-analytical method, with a hermeneutic approach. The main points of Rahman's thoughts related to the history of the development of hadith are comprehensive and strict. Then, the hermeneutic approach is used to explain the concepts or theories that are initially unclear related to the concept of sunnah-hadith become clear. The results of this study reveal that Rahman differentiates the concept of sunnah (conceptual sunnah) with the content of sunnah (literal sunnah). The earlier finds absolutes, and the last is more or less dependent (relative). According to Rahman, what distinguishes universal normative principles is the first sunnah. On the other hand, the literal sunnah allows us to understand the logical ratio behind the general principles contained in the conceptual sunnah. Thus, that binds us to obey Rasulullah PBUH, the Messenger of Allah is a conceptual sunnah, not a literal sunnah.","PeriodicalId":31932,"journal":{"name":"Millati Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millati Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18326/mlt.v7i1.7138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fazlur Rahman is an insider who has critical ideas about hadith. The reason is that there is a very long interval between the time of the Prophet Muhammad SAW. with the bookkeeping of hadith, as well as debatable about the concept of sunnah-hadith that is still not finished yet. The method used in this research is descriptive-analysis with a hermeneutic approach. According to Rahman, there is a fundamental difference between the definition of sunnah and hadith. Sunnah is a living tradition in society while hadith is a reportage of sunnah. This research is used library research, namely documentation data. The researcher uses descriptive-analytical method, with a hermeneutic approach. The main points of Rahman's thoughts related to the history of the development of hadith are comprehensive and strict. Then, the hermeneutic approach is used to explain the concepts or theories that are initially unclear related to the concept of sunnah-hadith become clear. The results of this study reveal that Rahman differentiates the concept of sunnah (conceptual sunnah) with the content of sunnah (literal sunnah). The earlier finds absolutes, and the last is more or less dependent (relative). According to Rahman, what distinguishes universal normative principles is the first sunnah. On the other hand, the literal sunnah allows us to understand the logical ratio behind the general principles contained in the conceptual sunnah. Thus, that binds us to obey Rasulullah PBUH, the Messenger of Allah is a conceptual sunnah, not a literal sunnah.
法兹鲁尔·拉赫曼对圣训批判重新定位的看法
法兹鲁尔·拉赫曼是一位内部人士,他对圣训有着批判性的看法。原因是在先知穆罕默德的时间之间有一个很长的间隔。与记帐的圣训,以及有争议的关于sunnah-hadith的概念,仍然没有完成。本研究使用的方法是解释学方法的描述性分析。根据拉赫曼的说法,圣行和圣训的定义有根本的区别。圣行是一种活的社会传统,而圣训则是对圣行的报道。本研究采用的是图书馆研究,即文献资料。研究者采用描述性分析方法,并辅以解释学方法。拉赫曼有关圣训发展史的思想要点是全面而严格的。然后,解释学的方法被用来解释最初不清楚的与圣训概念相关的概念或理论,变得清晰起来。本研究的结果表明,拉赫曼区分了sunnah的概念(概念性sunnah)和sunnah的内容(字面sunnah)。前者是绝对的,后者或多或少是依赖的(相对的)。根据拉赫曼的说法,区分普遍规范原则的是第一圣行。另一方面,字面上的圣行使我们能够理解概念上的圣行所包含的一般原则背后的逻辑比例。因此,这约束我们服从拉苏鲁拉·普赫,安拉的使者是一个概念上的圣训,而不是字面上的圣训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书