Effect of Delayed Endodontic Sealing with Dentin Biomodification on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Javed Ahmad, G. Sajjan, Durga Bhavani Panithini, Madhu Varma, Kalyan Satish R, K. D. Prasad
{"title":"Effect of Delayed Endodontic Sealing with Dentin Biomodification on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth","authors":"Javed Ahmad, G. Sajjan, Durga Bhavani Panithini, Madhu Varma, Kalyan Satish R, K. D. Prasad","doi":"10.1177/23202068231193606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endodontically treated teeth display altered tooth structure pertaining to various chemical irrigants and intracanal medicaments. To prevent the compromised adhesive bond, dentin biomodification is indicated. This study was designed to evaluate the influence of dentin biomodification on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated teeth following Delayed Endodontic Sealing (DES). In 50 maxillary central incisors, Class III cavities along with access cavities were prepared. The samples were randomly divided into five groups. Group 1: Intact teeth ( N = 10), Group 2: Immediate Endodontic Sealing (IES) ( N = 10); Group 3: DES after irrigation with 3% NaOCl ( N = 10); Group 4: DES with 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) as a biomodifier ( N = 10) and Group 5: DES with 5% grape seed extract (GSE) as a biomodifier ( N = 10). In Group 2 samples, composite restorations were done prior to irrigation with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Group 3 samples received root canal irrigation with 3% NaOCl for 1 min, etch and rinse procedure and composite restorations. In Groups 4 and 5, dentin biomodification was done prior to composite restorations. Teeth were subjected to fracture resistance tests. Statistical analysis was carried out employing analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc tests ( p < .05). IES group demonstrated the highest fracture resistance, with a significant difference statistically ( p < .05) when compared with the DES groups. DES modified with GSE resulted in significantly superior fracture resistance compared to DES only, but no statistical difference was present between the CHX and grape seed-treated DES groups. DES with the use of dentin biomodifiers such as 5% GSE and 2% CHX increased the fracture resistance of root canal-treated teeth compared to DES only.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068231193606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endodontically treated teeth display altered tooth structure pertaining to various chemical irrigants and intracanal medicaments. To prevent the compromised adhesive bond, dentin biomodification is indicated. This study was designed to evaluate the influence of dentin biomodification on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated teeth following Delayed Endodontic Sealing (DES). In 50 maxillary central incisors, Class III cavities along with access cavities were prepared. The samples were randomly divided into five groups. Group 1: Intact teeth ( N = 10), Group 2: Immediate Endodontic Sealing (IES) ( N = 10); Group 3: DES after irrigation with 3% NaOCl ( N = 10); Group 4: DES with 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) as a biomodifier ( N = 10) and Group 5: DES with 5% grape seed extract (GSE) as a biomodifier ( N = 10). In Group 2 samples, composite restorations were done prior to irrigation with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Group 3 samples received root canal irrigation with 3% NaOCl for 1 min, etch and rinse procedure and composite restorations. In Groups 4 and 5, dentin biomodification was done prior to composite restorations. Teeth were subjected to fracture resistance tests. Statistical analysis was carried out employing analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc tests ( p < .05). IES group demonstrated the highest fracture resistance, with a significant difference statistically ( p < .05) when compared with the DES groups. DES modified with GSE resulted in significantly superior fracture resistance compared to DES only, but no statistical difference was present between the CHX and grape seed-treated DES groups. DES with the use of dentin biomodifiers such as 5% GSE and 2% CHX increased the fracture resistance of root canal-treated teeth compared to DES only.
牙本质生物修饰延迟牙髓封闭对牙髓治疗后牙体抗折性的影响
经根管治疗的牙齿显示出与各种化学冲洗剂和管内药物有关的牙齿结构改变。为防止牙本质粘连受损,建议对牙本质进行生物修饰。本研究旨在评估牙本质生物修饰对延迟根管封闭(DES)后根管治疗牙的抗骨折能力的影响。对50例上颌中切牙进行III类空腔及通道空腔的制备。这些样本被随机分为五组。组1:完整牙(N = 10),组2:即刻牙髓密封(IES) (N = 10);第三组:3% NaOCl灌胃后DES (N = 10);第4组:以2%氯己定(CHX)为生物调节剂的DES (N = 10);第5组:以5%葡萄籽提取物(GSE)为生物调节剂的DES (N = 10)。在第2组样品中,在用3%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)冲洗之前进行复合修复。第3组采用3% NaOCl根管冲洗1分钟、蚀刻冲洗和复合修复。在第4组和第5组中,牙本质生物修饰在复合修复之前进行。牙齿进行了抗断裂试验。统计学分析采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验(p < 0.05)。IES组抗骨折能力最强,与DES组比较,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。经GSE修饰的DES的抗骨折性明显优于单纯DES,但CHX与葡萄籽处理的DES组之间无统计学差异。与仅使用DES相比,使用5% GSE和2% CHX等牙本质生物改性剂的DES增加了根管处理牙齿的抗折断性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信