Suitability of Different Live Feed for First Feeding of Freshwater Fish Larvae

Q4 Environmental Science
F. Lahnsteiner, E. Lahnsteiner, Anna Duenser
{"title":"Suitability of Different Live Feed for First Feeding of Freshwater Fish Larvae","authors":"F. Lahnsteiner, E. Lahnsteiner, Anna Duenser","doi":"10.3390/aquacj3020010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First feeding of many fish larvae depends on live feed. A comparative investigation on the effectiveness of different types of live feed is not available to our knowledge. Hence, we conducted a study to examine the effect of different types and combinations of live feed on the performance (survival rate, total length, body width, body mass, malformation rate) of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca, larvae. From day 0 (onset of exogenous feeding) to day 10, the saltwater rotifer Brachionus plicatilis, the freshwater rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus, the ciliate Paramecium bursaria, copepods (nauplii and copepodites) from a lake population, and Artemia nauplii were tested. Feeding with B. plicatilis, B. calyciflorus, and P. bursaria resulted in high survival rates of 80% and a homogenous and significant growth (increase in total length of 50% and in body width of 20%). As follow-up feed, copepod nauplii and Artemia nauplii were tested from day 11 to day 20. Copepod nauplii were superior to Artemia nauplii, as larvae fed with copepods showed higher survival rates (67–70% versus 38–47%) and a more homogeneous growth. A switch from seawater live feed to freshwater live feed or vice versa resulted in decreased survival rates. Therefore, a feeding regime consisting of B. calyciflorus or P. bursaria followed by copepods is considered optimal as first feed of pikeperch. The malformation rate was not affected by the tested feeding regimes. To investigate the wider applicability and transferability of these findings, complementary investigations were performed on burbot, Lota lota, and the freshwater whitefish Coregonus atterensis. The feeding regimes used for S. lucioperca larvae were also suitable for Lota lota. Moreover, L. lota could be fed with lake copepods from the onset of exogenous feeding. For C. atterensis, initial feeding with B. plicatilis, B. calyciflorus, or P. bursaria had no positive effects. Feeding with copepods from the onset of exogenous feeding was optimal considering survival rate and growth. Therefore, optimal first feeding regimes are very species specific and should be established for each new species.","PeriodicalId":36566,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Aquaculture Journal","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Aquaculture Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj3020010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

First feeding of many fish larvae depends on live feed. A comparative investigation on the effectiveness of different types of live feed is not available to our knowledge. Hence, we conducted a study to examine the effect of different types and combinations of live feed on the performance (survival rate, total length, body width, body mass, malformation rate) of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca, larvae. From day 0 (onset of exogenous feeding) to day 10, the saltwater rotifer Brachionus plicatilis, the freshwater rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus, the ciliate Paramecium bursaria, copepods (nauplii and copepodites) from a lake population, and Artemia nauplii were tested. Feeding with B. plicatilis, B. calyciflorus, and P. bursaria resulted in high survival rates of 80% and a homogenous and significant growth (increase in total length of 50% and in body width of 20%). As follow-up feed, copepod nauplii and Artemia nauplii were tested from day 11 to day 20. Copepod nauplii were superior to Artemia nauplii, as larvae fed with copepods showed higher survival rates (67–70% versus 38–47%) and a more homogeneous growth. A switch from seawater live feed to freshwater live feed or vice versa resulted in decreased survival rates. Therefore, a feeding regime consisting of B. calyciflorus or P. bursaria followed by copepods is considered optimal as first feed of pikeperch. The malformation rate was not affected by the tested feeding regimes. To investigate the wider applicability and transferability of these findings, complementary investigations were performed on burbot, Lota lota, and the freshwater whitefish Coregonus atterensis. The feeding regimes used for S. lucioperca larvae were also suitable for Lota lota. Moreover, L. lota could be fed with lake copepods from the onset of exogenous feeding. For C. atterensis, initial feeding with B. plicatilis, B. calyciflorus, or P. bursaria had no positive effects. Feeding with copepods from the onset of exogenous feeding was optimal considering survival rate and growth. Therefore, optimal first feeding regimes are very species specific and should be established for each new species.
不同饵料对淡水鱼幼鱼初次摄食的适宜性
许多幼鱼的第一次摄食依赖于活饲料。据我们所知,还没有对不同类型的活饲料的有效性进行比较调查。为此,本试验研究了不同种类和组合的活饲料对梭鲈幼虫的生产性能(存活率、总长度、体宽、体质量、畸形率)的影响。从第0天(开始外源摄食)开始至第10天,对湖泊种群的咸水轮虫(腕足轮虫)、淡水轮虫(萼花轮虫)、囊草履虫(草履虫)、桡足类(鹦鹉螺和桡足类)和鹦鹉耳蒿(Artemia nauplii)进行了实验。结果表明,与花萼双歧杆菌、花萼双歧杆菌和法氏囊双歧杆菌一起饲养,成活率高达80%,生长均匀且显著(体长增加50%,体宽增加20%)。作为后续饲料,从第11天至第20天分别对桡足类鹦鹉螺和鹦鹉耳蒿进行试验。桡足类幼体的成活率为67 ~ 70%,生长均匀性为38 ~ 47%。从海水活饲料转向淡水活饲料,或反之亦然,导致存活率下降。因此,以萼花棘球绦虫或滑囊棘球绦虫为辅的桡足类为首选饲料是适宜的。畸形率不受饲喂方式的影响。为了研究这些发现的更广泛的适用性和可转移性,对白鱀豚、白鱀豚和淡水白鱼Coregonus atterensis进行了补充调查。该方法同样适用于海鳕幼虫。而且,从外源取食开始,大叶藻就可以与湖泊桡足类动物一起取食。对白桦尺蠖而言,初始取食可塑尺蠖、萼花尺蠖或法氏囊尺蠖均无正面影响。考虑到存活率和生长,从外源摄食开始用桡足类摄食是最佳的。因此,最佳的首次摄食制度是非常特定于物种的,应该为每个新物种建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indonesian Aquaculture Journal
Indonesian Aquaculture Journal Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信