Does Omnibus Law Affect the Indonesian Investment Regulations towards Chinese Investors?

M. Iqbal, M. Mujib, Yuliannova Lestari
{"title":"Does Omnibus Law Affect the Indonesian Investment Regulations towards Chinese Investors?","authors":"M. Iqbal, M. Mujib, Yuliannova Lestari","doi":"10.24090/volksgeist.v5i2.6838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examined the polemic of Indonesian omnibus Law that affect the international market interest in Indonesia, especially for the Chinese investor. On the one hand, this act and its implementation act give hope for a more conducive climate for foreign investment. On the other hand, it also invites resistance from various components of the nation due to the non-transparent procedure of its formation. It substantively degrades the interests of the wider community and is more in favour of the interests of investors. This research comes up with the liberal institutionalism theory; when state elites do not predict self-interested benefits from cooperation, it means no expectation of cooperation to occur, nor the institutions that facilitate cooperation to develop. On the other hand, when states can jointly benefit from cooperation, governments expect to attempt to establish such an institution. . As a result, Omnibus Law affects ambiguity and uncertainty for foreign investor especially for Chinese. However Omnibus Law is still uncertain and ambiguous; in reality the foreigner investment especially Chinese Investments in Indonesia is still run well and tend to increase. It is because Constitutional Court's decision did not invalidate 47 government regulations and 4 presidential regulations derived from the Job Creation Law. In addition, from the perspective of liberal Institutionalism, it has been long time Indonesia and China has built diplomacy for continuous mutual cooperation.","PeriodicalId":34760,"journal":{"name":"Volksgeist","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volksgeist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v5i2.6838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper examined the polemic of Indonesian omnibus Law that affect the international market interest in Indonesia, especially for the Chinese investor. On the one hand, this act and its implementation act give hope for a more conducive climate for foreign investment. On the other hand, it also invites resistance from various components of the nation due to the non-transparent procedure of its formation. It substantively degrades the interests of the wider community and is more in favour of the interests of investors. This research comes up with the liberal institutionalism theory; when state elites do not predict self-interested benefits from cooperation, it means no expectation of cooperation to occur, nor the institutions that facilitate cooperation to develop. On the other hand, when states can jointly benefit from cooperation, governments expect to attempt to establish such an institution. . As a result, Omnibus Law affects ambiguity and uncertainty for foreign investor especially for Chinese. However Omnibus Law is still uncertain and ambiguous; in reality the foreigner investment especially Chinese Investments in Indonesia is still run well and tend to increase. It is because Constitutional Court's decision did not invalidate 47 government regulations and 4 presidential regulations derived from the Job Creation Law. In addition, from the perspective of liberal Institutionalism, it has been long time Indonesia and China has built diplomacy for continuous mutual cooperation.
综合法是否影响印尼对中国投资者的投资法规?
本文考察了印尼综合法的争议对印尼国际市场利益的影响,特别是对中国投资者的影响。一方面,该法案及其实施法案为外国投资营造了更加有利的环境。另一方面,由于其形成过程不透明,也招致了国家各阶层的抵制。它大大降低了更广泛社会的利益,更有利于投资者的利益。本研究提出了自由制度主义理论;当国家精英不预测合作带来的自利利益时,这意味着不期望合作发生,也不期望促进合作的机构发展。另一方面,当各国可以从合作中共同受益时,政府期望尝试建立这样一种制度。综上所述,《综合法》对外国投资者尤其是中国投资者造成了模糊性和不确定性的影响。然而,综合法仍然是不确定的和模糊的;实际上,外国投资,特别是中国在印尼的投资仍然运行良好,而且有增加的趋势。这是因为,宪法裁判所的判决并没有使《创造工作岗位法》相关的47项政府规定和4项总统规定失效。此外,从自由制度主义的角度来看,印尼和中国早就建立了持续相互合作的外交。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信