The Influence of c-Kit and NRAS Mutation on Patients’ Survival in Metastatic Melanoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Chemotherapy

Tom Möller, H. Schulze
{"title":"The Influence of c-Kit and NRAS Mutation on Patients’ Survival in Metastatic Melanoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Chemotherapy","authors":"Tom Möller, H. Schulze","doi":"10.3390/dermato2020006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The high metastasis and mortality rates of melanoma in the era of chemotherapy have decreased significantly over the last 10 years. The success is owed largely to the introduction of targeted therapy of oncogenes and immunotherapies, such as checkpoint inhibitors. The aim of the present retrospective, monocentric study is to investigate the impact of chemotherapy or immunotherapy in 550 patients with metastatic melanoma between the years of 2010 and 2019, looking at overall survival while considering BRAF/NRAS/c-KIT mutation status. A total of 17 patients were found to have a c-KIT mutation in exon 11, 13 or 17, including 58.3% with acral lentiginous melanoma, with 53% localized primarily in the lower limbs. In 13.3% of the 231 NRAS-mutated melanomas, primary tumor location was found to be in UV-exposed skin such as on the head and neck, thus about 50% lower than in the 302 patients with wild-type (BRAF-/NRAS-/cKIT-negative) melanoma. Patients with NRAS-mutated melanomas had a significantly lower probability of survival compared to patients with wild-type melanomas, irrespective of the recommendations of the clinical guideline on drug therapy for metastatic melanoma that have been in force since 2010. In contrast to patients with wild-type melanoma who showed a higher probability of survival receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, the overall survival of patients with NRAS-mutated metastatic melanoma was not more favorable after therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to chemotherapy treatment.","PeriodicalId":11115,"journal":{"name":"Dermato-Endocrinology","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermato-Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dermato2020006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The high metastasis and mortality rates of melanoma in the era of chemotherapy have decreased significantly over the last 10 years. The success is owed largely to the introduction of targeted therapy of oncogenes and immunotherapies, such as checkpoint inhibitors. The aim of the present retrospective, monocentric study is to investigate the impact of chemotherapy or immunotherapy in 550 patients with metastatic melanoma between the years of 2010 and 2019, looking at overall survival while considering BRAF/NRAS/c-KIT mutation status. A total of 17 patients were found to have a c-KIT mutation in exon 11, 13 or 17, including 58.3% with acral lentiginous melanoma, with 53% localized primarily in the lower limbs. In 13.3% of the 231 NRAS-mutated melanomas, primary tumor location was found to be in UV-exposed skin such as on the head and neck, thus about 50% lower than in the 302 patients with wild-type (BRAF-/NRAS-/cKIT-negative) melanoma. Patients with NRAS-mutated melanomas had a significantly lower probability of survival compared to patients with wild-type melanomas, irrespective of the recommendations of the clinical guideline on drug therapy for metastatic melanoma that have been in force since 2010. In contrast to patients with wild-type melanoma who showed a higher probability of survival receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, the overall survival of patients with NRAS-mutated metastatic melanoma was not more favorable after therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to chemotherapy treatment.
c-Kit和NRAS突变对接受免疫检查点抑制剂和化疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者生存的影响
在化疗时代,黑色素瘤的高转移率和死亡率在过去10年中显著下降。这一成功在很大程度上归功于引入了针对癌基因的靶向治疗和免疫疗法,如检查点抑制剂。本回顾性单中心研究的目的是调查2010年至2019年期间550名转移性黑色素瘤患者化疗或免疫治疗的影响,在考虑BRAF/NRAS/c-KIT突变状态的同时观察总生存率。共有17例患者在11、13或17外显子中发现c-KIT突变,其中58.3%为肢端色素性黑色素瘤,53%主要定位于下肢。在231例NRAS突变的黑色素瘤中,有13.3%的患者原发肿瘤位于暴露在紫外线下的皮肤,如头部和颈部,这比302例野生型(BRAF-/NRAS-/ ckit阴性)黑色素瘤患者的原发肿瘤位置低约50%。与野生型黑色素瘤患者相比,nras突变的黑色素瘤患者的生存概率明显较低,无论2010年以来生效的转移性黑色素瘤药物治疗临床指南的建议如何。与接受免疫检查点抑制剂的野生型黑色素瘤患者相比,nras突变的转移性黑色素瘤患者在接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后的总体生存率并不比化疗更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信