Effect of supplementation during the breeding season on a May-calving beef herd in the Nebraska Sandhills

A.C. Lansford, J.A. Musgrave, R.N. Funston PAS
{"title":"Effect of supplementation during the breeding season on a May-calving beef herd in the Nebraska Sandhills","authors":"A.C. Lansford,&nbsp;J.A. Musgrave,&nbsp;R.N. Funston PAS","doi":"10.15232/pas.2017-01693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>A 4-yr study at the Gudmundsen Sandhills Laboratory, Whitman, Nebraska, evaluated the effects of supplementation during the breeding season on May-calving heifers and primiparous cows. Beginning mid-July, and throughout a 45-d breeding season, heifers and primiparous cows grazed upland range and received either (1) no supplement (n = 128 heifers, 67 primiparous cows) or (2) 0.45 or 0.91 kg/animal per day for heifers and primiparous cows, respectively, of a 32% CP (DM) supplement (n = 129 heifers, 68 primiparous cows). Cows and heifers were synchronized using a single prostaglandin F</span><sub>2α</sub><span> injection 5 d after bull placement (1:20 bull-to-cow ratio). Pregnancy was diagnosed via transrectal ultrasonography in mid-October or November for heifers and primiparous cows, respectively. Weaning occurred at pregnancy diagnosis. Body weight and BCS were taken at several time points throughout the year. Heifer BW and BCS following supplementation were unaffected by treatment (</span><em>P</em> ≥ 0.10). Primiparous cow BW and BCS were greater in supplemented cows at the time of pregnancy diagnosis (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Pregnancy rate was similar (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.41) between treatments for both age groups. Treatment did not affect calf BW at birth or dystocia rates for primiparous cows (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.17). Calf BW at weaning was greater (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) for supplemented primiparous dams. Supplementation during the breeding season did not affect pregnancy rates in young beef females, despite BW and BCS changes in primiparous cows.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22841,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Animal Scientist","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 269-274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2017-01693","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Animal Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618300470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A 4-yr study at the Gudmundsen Sandhills Laboratory, Whitman, Nebraska, evaluated the effects of supplementation during the breeding season on May-calving heifers and primiparous cows. Beginning mid-July, and throughout a 45-d breeding season, heifers and primiparous cows grazed upland range and received either (1) no supplement (n = 128 heifers, 67 primiparous cows) or (2) 0.45 or 0.91 kg/animal per day for heifers and primiparous cows, respectively, of a 32% CP (DM) supplement (n = 129 heifers, 68 primiparous cows). Cows and heifers were synchronized using a single prostaglandin F injection 5 d after bull placement (1:20 bull-to-cow ratio). Pregnancy was diagnosed via transrectal ultrasonography in mid-October or November for heifers and primiparous cows, respectively. Weaning occurred at pregnancy diagnosis. Body weight and BCS were taken at several time points throughout the year. Heifer BW and BCS following supplementation were unaffected by treatment (P ≥ 0.10). Primiparous cow BW and BCS were greater in supplemented cows at the time of pregnancy diagnosis (P < 0.01). Pregnancy rate was similar (P ≥ 0.41) between treatments for both age groups. Treatment did not affect calf BW at birth or dystocia rates for primiparous cows (P ≥ 0.17). Calf BW at weaning was greater (P < 0.01) for supplemented primiparous dams. Supplementation during the breeding season did not affect pregnancy rates in young beef females, despite BW and BCS changes in primiparous cows.

内布拉斯加州沙丘繁殖季节对5月产犊牛群的补充影响
内布拉斯加州惠特曼市的Gudmundsen Sandhills实验室进行了一项为期4年的研究,评估了在繁殖季节补充维生素对5月产犊的小母牛和初产母牛的影响。从7月中旬开始,在45天的繁殖季节中,母牛和母牛在高地牧场放牧,并分别接受(1)不补充(n = 128头母牛,67头母牛)或(2)母牛和母牛分别每天补充0.45或0.91千克32% CP (DM) (n = 129头母牛,68头母牛)。在公牛放置后5 d,按1:20的牛牛比同步注射单次前列腺素F2α。分别于10月中旬或11月通过经直肠超声检查对母牛和初产母牛进行妊娠诊断。妊娠诊断时发生断奶。在全年的几个时间点测量体重和BCS。添加后的小母牛体重和BCS不受处理影响(P≥0.10)。妊娠诊断时,补饲奶牛的初产牛BW和BCS更高(P <0.01)。两组治疗的妊娠率相似(P≥0.41)。治疗对初产奶牛的出生体重和难产率没有影响(P≥0.17)。犊牛断奶时体重更大(P <0.01)。尽管初产母牛的体重和BCS发生了变化,但在繁殖季节补充维生素d对年轻母牛的怀孕率没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信