Prediction of Sanding Likelihood Intervals Using Different Approaches

Jassim Mohammed Al Said Naji, G. Abdul-Majeed, Ali K. Alhuraishawy, Abbas R. Abbas
{"title":"Prediction of Sanding Likelihood Intervals Using Different Approaches","authors":"Jassim Mohammed Al Said Naji, G. Abdul-Majeed, Ali K. Alhuraishawy, Abbas R. Abbas","doi":"10.52716/jprs.v13i2.698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sand production is undesirable matters, occurring in wells that are producing from sand reservoirs. It causes many problems such as erosion and grains accumulation in downhole and surface equipment’s, and formation subsidence. Important stage in sanding problem solution is a prediction of likelihood sand production intervals. In present paper, a vertical well X1 that is producing from Asmari reservoir in Y field at southern Iraq was selected for study.  Asmari reservoir was classified to six units: A, B1, B2, B3, B4, and C. B zones consisted from sandstone with others rock types. Eight approaches were used for prediction sanding onset intervals by dealing with X1 well as open hole completion. Utilized eight prediction methods are compressional sonic wave (CSW), unconfined compressive strength (UCS), total porosity (PHIT), shear modulus to bulk compressibility (G/Cb), B-Index, Schlumberger index (S- Index), combined index (Ec-Index) and critical drawdown pressure (CDDP). All these methods performed based on 2462 measured points of CSW, sonic shear wave log (SSW), and density log (DL). Sand production likelihood intervals was selected by determination of cutoff values of adopted methods. Sand is possible to occur if interval has values lower than cutoff values of G/Cb, UCS, B-Index, S-Index, Ec, and CDDP and greater than cutoff values of CSW, and PHIT. Obtained cutoff values of eight approaches were 800 x 109 psi2, 36 Mpa, 0.2, 80 us/ft, 10000 Mpa, 108 Mpa, and 2700 Mpa, of G/Cb, UCS, PHIT, CSW, B-Index, S-Index, and Ec respectively. As well as sand production is possible to occur of bottomhole flowing pressure lower than calculated CDDP. Some Intervals had high CDDP that referred to abnormal pressure zones consisted from shale. Determination of sand onset intervals is a key for selecting best methods for controlling.","PeriodicalId":16710,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v13i2.698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sand production is undesirable matters, occurring in wells that are producing from sand reservoirs. It causes many problems such as erosion and grains accumulation in downhole and surface equipment’s, and formation subsidence. Important stage in sanding problem solution is a prediction of likelihood sand production intervals. In present paper, a vertical well X1 that is producing from Asmari reservoir in Y field at southern Iraq was selected for study.  Asmari reservoir was classified to six units: A, B1, B2, B3, B4, and C. B zones consisted from sandstone with others rock types. Eight approaches were used for prediction sanding onset intervals by dealing with X1 well as open hole completion. Utilized eight prediction methods are compressional sonic wave (CSW), unconfined compressive strength (UCS), total porosity (PHIT), shear modulus to bulk compressibility (G/Cb), B-Index, Schlumberger index (S- Index), combined index (Ec-Index) and critical drawdown pressure (CDDP). All these methods performed based on 2462 measured points of CSW, sonic shear wave log (SSW), and density log (DL). Sand production likelihood intervals was selected by determination of cutoff values of adopted methods. Sand is possible to occur if interval has values lower than cutoff values of G/Cb, UCS, B-Index, S-Index, Ec, and CDDP and greater than cutoff values of CSW, and PHIT. Obtained cutoff values of eight approaches were 800 x 109 psi2, 36 Mpa, 0.2, 80 us/ft, 10000 Mpa, 108 Mpa, and 2700 Mpa, of G/Cb, UCS, PHIT, CSW, B-Index, S-Index, and Ec respectively. As well as sand production is possible to occur of bottomhole flowing pressure lower than calculated CDDP. Some Intervals had high CDDP that referred to abnormal pressure zones consisted from shale. Determination of sand onset intervals is a key for selecting best methods for controlling.
用不同方法预测出砂似然区间
出砂是不希望发生的事情,发生在从砂储层开采的井中。这给井下和地面设备带来了侵蚀、颗粒堆积、地层沉降等诸多问题。解决出砂问题的一个重要阶段是预测出砂层的可能性。本文以伊拉克南部Y油田Asmari油藏的X1直井为研究对象。将Asmari油藏划分为A、B1、B2、B3、B4、c 6个单元。通过将X1井作为裸眼完井处理,采用了8种方法预测起砂层段。使用了8种预测方法,分别是压缩声波(CSW)、无侧限抗压强度(UCS)、总孔隙度(PHIT)、剪切模量/体积压缩率(G/Cb)、B-Index、斯伦贝谢指数(S- index)、综合指数(Ec-Index)和临界压降压力(CDDP)。所有方法均基于2462个CSW测点、声波横波测井(SSW)和密度测井(DL)进行。通过确定所采用方法的截止值,选择出砂可能性区间。如果层段的值低于G/Cb、UCS、B-Index、S-Index、Ec和CDDP的截止值,且大于CSW和PHIT的截止值,则可能发生出砂。8种方法对G/Cb、UCS、PHIT、CSW、B-Index、S-Index和Ec的截止值分别为800 × 109 psi2、36 Mpa、0.2、80 us/ft、10000 Mpa、108 Mpa和2700 Mpa。当井底流动压力低于计算的CDDP值时,也有可能出砂。部分层段CDDP较高,为页岩组成的异常压力带。起砂层段的确定是选择最佳防治方法的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信