Effect of milrinone versus placebo on hemodynamic in patients with septic shock: A randomize control trial

Suratee Chobngam, S. Tongyoo
{"title":"Effect of milrinone versus placebo on hemodynamic in patients with septic shock: A randomize control trial","authors":"Suratee Chobngam, S. Tongyoo","doi":"10.54205/ccc.v30.255002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Sepsis is one of the most serious healthcare problems worldwide, which is associated with high mortality and financial burdens. The common causes of death are refractory shock and multi-organ failure. Myocardial dysfunction, a relatively common complication of septic shock, causes a significantly decrease in stroke volume and cardiac output. This results in insufficient blood supply to the organs, creates multi-organ failure and finally, leading to death. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2016 also recommended using dobutamine in septic shock patients who had been resuscitated until achieving normal blood pressure target of mean arterial pressure 65 mmHg or more, but still had evidence of inadequate tissue perfusion. Milrinone action via an alternative pathway from the sympathetic inotropic agents, makes the milrinone to be used as an option for improve cardiac function among sepsis patients. However, there are few studies of milrinone in patients with septic shock. \n\nMethods: We plan to conduct a double blind randomized controlled trial, enrolling patients at Siriraj hospital and Hat-Yai hospital. The adults with the diagnosis of septic shock according to definition of SEPSIS III will be screened. Patients who receive fluid resuscitation at least 30 mL/kg, mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mmHg, with a clinical sign of poor tissue perfusion, or evidence of impaired left ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%) will be enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio by their sequential number to receive either milrinone (intervention group) or placebo (control group). The physician performs an echocardiogram for assessing cardiac function, before the starting of the study drug and after the 6 and 24 hours. The monitoring of vital signs, urine output, and lactate at 6 and 24 hours after milrinone or placebo commencement is recorded. \n\nConclusion: This study will evaluate the efficacy of milrinone in improving cardiac output among adult patients with septic shock who is resuscitated to achieve target blood pressure but still have signs of poor tissue perfusion.","PeriodicalId":76963,"journal":{"name":"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54205/ccc.v30.255002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is one of the most serious healthcare problems worldwide, which is associated with high mortality and financial burdens. The common causes of death are refractory shock and multi-organ failure. Myocardial dysfunction, a relatively common complication of septic shock, causes a significantly decrease in stroke volume and cardiac output. This results in insufficient blood supply to the organs, creates multi-organ failure and finally, leading to death. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2016 also recommended using dobutamine in septic shock patients who had been resuscitated until achieving normal blood pressure target of mean arterial pressure 65 mmHg or more, but still had evidence of inadequate tissue perfusion. Milrinone action via an alternative pathway from the sympathetic inotropic agents, makes the milrinone to be used as an option for improve cardiac function among sepsis patients. However, there are few studies of milrinone in patients with septic shock. Methods: We plan to conduct a double blind randomized controlled trial, enrolling patients at Siriraj hospital and Hat-Yai hospital. The adults with the diagnosis of septic shock according to definition of SEPSIS III will be screened. Patients who receive fluid resuscitation at least 30 mL/kg, mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mmHg, with a clinical sign of poor tissue perfusion, or evidence of impaired left ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%) will be enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio by their sequential number to receive either milrinone (intervention group) or placebo (control group). The physician performs an echocardiogram for assessing cardiac function, before the starting of the study drug and after the 6 and 24 hours. The monitoring of vital signs, urine output, and lactate at 6 and 24 hours after milrinone or placebo commencement is recorded. Conclusion: This study will evaluate the efficacy of milrinone in improving cardiac output among adult patients with septic shock who is resuscitated to achieve target blood pressure but still have signs of poor tissue perfusion.
米力农与安慰剂对脓毒性休克患者血流动力学的影响:一项随机对照试验
背景:脓毒症是世界范围内最严重的卫生保健问题之一,与高死亡率和经济负担有关。常见的死亡原因是顽固性休克和多器官衰竭。心肌功能障碍是感染性休克的一种较为常见的并发症,可导致卒中量和心输出量的显著减少。这导致器官供血不足,造成多器官衰竭,最终导致死亡。《存活脓毒症运动指南2016》还建议在复苏至平均动脉压达到或高于65 mmHg的正常血压目标,但仍有证据表明组织灌注不足的脓毒症休克患者使用多巴酚丁胺。米力农通过交感肌力药物的替代途径起作用,使米力农成为改善败血症患者心功能的一种选择。然而,米力农在感染性休克患者中的应用研究很少。方法:我们计划在Siriraj医院和Hat-Yai医院进行双盲随机对照试验。根据脓毒症III定义诊断为脓毒性休克的成人将进行筛查。接受液体复苏至少30 mL/kg、平均动脉压(MAP)≥65 mmHg、有组织灌注不良临床体征或左室收缩功能受损证据(左室射血分数(LVEF) < 40%)的患者将被纳入研究。患者按序列号按1:1的比例随机分配接受米力农(干预组)或安慰剂(对照组)治疗。在研究药物开始前、6小时和24小时后,医生通过超声心动图评估心功能。记录米力农或安慰剂开始使用后6和24小时的生命体征、尿量和乳酸浓度监测。结论:本研究将评估米力农对复苏达到目标血压但仍有组织灌注不良迹象的成人感染性休克患者心输出量的改善效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信