Equipment selection for an e-commerce company using Entropy-based TOPSIS, EDAS and CODAS methods during the COVID-19

IF 1.2 Q4 MANAGEMENT
LogForum Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI:10.17270/j.Log.2021.603
Y. Ersoy
{"title":"Equipment selection for an e-commerce company using Entropy-based TOPSIS, EDAS and CODAS methods during the COVID-19","authors":"Y. Ersoy","doi":"10.17270/j.Log.2021.603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The importance and market share of e-commerce has been increasing with the COVID-19 pandemic in recent days. Employees sometimes cannot go to the workplace due to epidemics such as COVID-19 that is spreading rapidly around the world, natural disasters and accidents. Companies can continue to serve their customers with the internet infrastructure and computer technologies they will provide to their employees. Thus, e-commerce companies can provide a sustainable competitive advantage in the sector. Working with the right suppliers is one of the important decisions that will improve the service quality of the firms and affect the sustainability of the enterprise. Methods: This study aims to select the best laptop for a company in the online trade industry using Entropy-based EDAS, CODAS and TOPSIS methods. In the study, 6 alternative laptops have been evaluated according to hard disk capacity, ram, battery power, processor speed, weight, price criteria. The Entropy method has been used to identify the weights of the criteria in the study. These criteria weights have been used in EDAS, CODAS and TOPSIS methods. TOPSIS, EDAS and CODAS methods have been used to determine the best alternative. Also, the correlation between the results of the TOPSIS, EDAS and CODAS methods has been examined with the Spearman Correlation approach. Results: As a result of the Entropy method, it has been determined that the most important criterion is the hard disk capacity criterion. TOPSIS, EDAS and CODAS method results have been compared and the most suitable alternative has been selected. According to the results of the study, the best alternative has been selected as A5. Spearman Correlation analysis results show that there was a strong positive relationship between the methods used and the results obtained. Conclusions: The study differs from existing studies in the literature in that it is the first study in which laptop selection was made using TOPSIS, EDAS and CODAS methods together. The results of this study can be compared with the results of future studies that will be carried out using different MCDM methods and different data.","PeriodicalId":44682,"journal":{"name":"LogForum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LogForum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17270/j.Log.2021.603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The importance and market share of e-commerce has been increasing with the COVID-19 pandemic in recent days. Employees sometimes cannot go to the workplace due to epidemics such as COVID-19 that is spreading rapidly around the world, natural disasters and accidents. Companies can continue to serve their customers with the internet infrastructure and computer technologies they will provide to their employees. Thus, e-commerce companies can provide a sustainable competitive advantage in the sector. Working with the right suppliers is one of the important decisions that will improve the service quality of the firms and affect the sustainability of the enterprise. Methods: This study aims to select the best laptop for a company in the online trade industry using Entropy-based EDAS, CODAS and TOPSIS methods. In the study, 6 alternative laptops have been evaluated according to hard disk capacity, ram, battery power, processor speed, weight, price criteria. The Entropy method has been used to identify the weights of the criteria in the study. These criteria weights have been used in EDAS, CODAS and TOPSIS methods. TOPSIS, EDAS and CODAS methods have been used to determine the best alternative. Also, the correlation between the results of the TOPSIS, EDAS and CODAS methods has been examined with the Spearman Correlation approach. Results: As a result of the Entropy method, it has been determined that the most important criterion is the hard disk capacity criterion. TOPSIS, EDAS and CODAS method results have been compared and the most suitable alternative has been selected. According to the results of the study, the best alternative has been selected as A5. Spearman Correlation analysis results show that there was a strong positive relationship between the methods used and the results obtained. Conclusions: The study differs from existing studies in the literature in that it is the first study in which laptop selection was made using TOPSIS, EDAS and CODAS methods together. The results of this study can be compared with the results of future studies that will be carried out using different MCDM methods and different data.
基于熵的TOPSIS、EDAS和CODAS方法在新冠肺炎疫情期间的电子商务公司设备选择
背景:近年来,随着新冠肺炎疫情的爆发,电子商务的重要性和市场份额不断提升。在世界范围内迅速扩散的新冠肺炎(COVID-19)等传染病、自然灾害、事故等,有时会导致员工无法上班。公司可以继续为客户提供互联网基础设施和计算机技术,它们将向员工提供这些技术。因此,电子商务公司可以在该领域提供可持续的竞争优势。与合适的供应商合作是提高企业服务质量和影响企业可持续发展的重要决策之一。方法:采用基于熵的EDAS、CODAS和TOPSIS方法,为某在线贸易企业选择最佳笔记本电脑。在这项研究中,根据硬盘容量、内存、电池电量、处理器速度、重量和价格标准,对6种替代笔记本电脑进行了评估。在研究中,熵值法被用来确定各指标的权重。这些标准权重已用于EDAS、CODAS和TOPSIS方法。采用TOPSIS、EDAS和CODAS方法确定最佳替代方案。此外,TOPSIS, EDAS和CODAS方法结果之间的相关性已经用Spearman相关方法进行了检验。结果:通过熵值法确定了最重要的判据是硬盘容量判据。比较了TOPSIS法、EDAS法和CODAS法的结果,选择了最合适的方法。根据研究结果,选择最佳方案为A5。Spearman相关分析结果表明,所采用的方法与所得结果之间存在很强的正相关关系。结论:本研究与现有文献研究的不同之处在于,它是第一个同时使用TOPSIS、EDAS和CODAS方法进行笔记本电脑选择的研究。本研究的结果可以与未来使用不同MCDM方法和不同数据进行的研究结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LogForum
LogForum MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
31
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信