Viaggi, tempi e mondi: l’Oriente nell’opera di Mário Cláudio

IF 0.2 Q4 LINGUISTICS

Studi e Saggi Linguistici Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.36253/978-88-5518-467-0.26

Catarina Nunes de Almeida

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The starting point of this paper is three works of the contemporary Portuguese writer Mário Cláudio – the novels Peregrinação de Barnabé das Índias (1998), Os Naufrágios de Camões (2017) and the play A Ilha de Oriente (1989) –, focusing on how the author rewrites the voyages of Discovery of the 16th century and shapes an image of the East. My aim is to analyse the representation of the so-called Orient and the memory of maritime travels, not only from the point of view of Mário Cláudio’s poetics, but also in the light of a collective discourse that is at the same time aesthetic, historical and mythical.

查看原文本刊更多论文

旅行、时间和工作的世界:东方Má里约热内卢Cláudio

本文以葡萄牙当代作家Mário Cláudio的三部作品——小说《peregrina o de barnab das Índias》(1998)、《Os Naufrágios de Camões》(2017)和戏剧《东方之旅》(1989)为切入点，重点研究作者如何改写16世纪的发现之旅，塑造东方形象。我的目的是分析所谓东方的再现和海上旅行的记忆，不仅从Mário Cláudio诗学的角度出发，而且从美学、历史和神话的集体话语的角度出发。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studi e Saggi Linguistici LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： debate in Italy, especially for those scholars working in the field of Indo-European Historical Linguistics and contemporary Theoretical Linguistics. Today, after 50 years of life, Studi e Saggi Linguistici has a firm position in this field, but it also gained a larger international profile, including well-known foreign scholars as members of its Scientific Committee, and fostering the publication of English-written papers. The Editors always aim at publishing original and innovative papers, whose quality and exactness are guaranteed by the prestigious Scientific Committee, and by the anonymous peer-review process. Although a certain preference is accorded to both historical and general Linguistics, in line with the tradition, the Journal welcomes scientific contributions concerning any linguistic field, with no preference or prejudice for particular methodological approaches and theoretical paradigms.