Evaluating The Semantic Mapping

D. Wardani
{"title":"Evaluating The Semantic Mapping","authors":"D. Wardani","doi":"10.11591/EECSI.V5I5.1648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Along the increasing of the importance of links in the network of data, they should be considered more in the mapping relational to graph model. Semantic abstraction gaps often occur during the mapping process where the link in the real world is mapped as a node in a graph model. This paper focused on evaluating the result of mapping and converting without losing the semantics. We propose the evaluation of our approach by using schema.org as the semantic standard. The experiments in three data sets show that the semantic mapping approach is pretty effective. We obtain quite good score matching without considering the gap index (the average is 0.6922) and with considering the gap index (the average is 0.5264) and the average precision score, 0.7042, is pretty good too.","PeriodicalId":20498,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of the Electrical Engineering Computer Science and Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of the Electrical Engineering Computer Science and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/EECSI.V5I5.1648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Along the increasing of the importance of links in the network of data, they should be considered more in the mapping relational to graph model. Semantic abstraction gaps often occur during the mapping process where the link in the real world is mapped as a node in a graph model. This paper focused on evaluating the result of mapping and converting without losing the semantics. We propose the evaluation of our approach by using schema.org as the semantic standard. The experiments in three data sets show that the semantic mapping approach is pretty effective. We obtain quite good score matching without considering the gap index (the average is 0.6922) and with considering the gap index (the average is 0.5264) and the average precision score, 0.7042, is pretty good too.
评估语义映射
随着数据网络中链路的重要性日益提高,在关系图映射模型中应更多地考虑链路。在映射过程中,将现实世界中的链接映射为图模型中的节点时,经常会出现语义抽象缺口。本文的重点是在不丢失语义的情况下评估映射和转换的结果。我们建议使用schema.org作为语义标准来评估我们的方法。在三个数据集上的实验表明,语义映射方法是非常有效的。我们在不考虑差距指数(平均值为0.6922)和考虑差距指数(平均值为0.5264)的情况下获得了相当好的分数匹配,平均精度分数0.7042也很不错。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信