Rational Irrationality: A Two Stage Decision Making Model

Rafael A Acevedo, Elvis Aponte, Pedro Harmath, Jose Mora Mora
{"title":"Rational Irrationality: A Two Stage Decision Making Model","authors":"Rafael A Acevedo, Elvis Aponte, Pedro Harmath, Jose Mora Mora","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3595725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a mathematical two-stage decision making model based on dual-decision models from behavioral economics that includes, in addition to cognitive and affective systems, an individualistic human factor and a stochastic shock. The model provides a new vision of the decision-making process and the impact of individualism. In the first stage, the agent´s initial willingness to choose is obtained following traditional economic theory but including an individual human factor, which is composed by the learning process, free will, and other human factors. This allows us to explain the reason why sometimes people are inclined to choose options that seem to be irrational decisions from the view of traditional economics logic. In the second stage, the model explains how the cognitive and affective systems and the influence of a stochastic shock affect the initial willingness to choose, obtained in the first stage. The shock might be produced by those negative and/or positive feelings and information not known or considered previously that allows the individual arrive to the final decision. Finally, our model demonstrates that the individual human factor and the stochastic shock are fundamental elements that define the rational irrationality when traditional economic theory fails to explain individuals´ choices.","PeriodicalId":8731,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3595725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper proposes a mathematical two-stage decision making model based on dual-decision models from behavioral economics that includes, in addition to cognitive and affective systems, an individualistic human factor and a stochastic shock. The model provides a new vision of the decision-making process and the impact of individualism. In the first stage, the agent´s initial willingness to choose is obtained following traditional economic theory but including an individual human factor, which is composed by the learning process, free will, and other human factors. This allows us to explain the reason why sometimes people are inclined to choose options that seem to be irrational decisions from the view of traditional economics logic. In the second stage, the model explains how the cognitive and affective systems and the influence of a stochastic shock affect the initial willingness to choose, obtained in the first stage. The shock might be produced by those negative and/or positive feelings and information not known or considered previously that allows the individual arrive to the final decision. Finally, our model demonstrates that the individual human factor and the stochastic shock are fundamental elements that define the rational irrationality when traditional economic theory fails to explain individuals´ choices.
理性非理性:一个两阶段决策模型
本文提出了一个基于行为经济学双重决策模型的数学两阶段决策模型,该模型除了包括认知系统和情感系统外,还包括个人主义的人为因素和随机冲击。该模型为决策过程和个人主义的影响提供了新的视角。在第一阶段,agent的初始选择意愿是根据传统的经济理论得到的,但包含了个体的人为因素,它是由学习过程、自由意志和其他人为因素组成的。这使我们能够从传统经济学逻辑的角度解释为什么有时人们倾向于选择看似非理性的选择。在第二阶段,该模型解释了认知和情感系统以及随机冲击的影响如何影响在第一阶段获得的初始选择意愿。这种冲击可能是由那些消极和/或积极的感觉和信息所产生的,这些信息是之前不知道或考虑过的,可以让个人做出最终决定。最后,我们的模型表明,当传统经济理论无法解释个人选择时,个体人为因素和随机冲击是定义理性非理性的基本要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信