A Comparison of Fuzzy Hashes: Evaluation, Guidelines, and Future Suggestions

Amanda Lee, T. Atkison
{"title":"A Comparison of Fuzzy Hashes: Evaluation, Guidelines, and Future Suggestions","authors":"Amanda Lee, T. Atkison","doi":"10.1145/3077286.3077289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fuzzy hashes are gaining recognition in the realm of digital forensics as an alternative method of recognizing similar or nearly identical files. However, despite a high diversity of algorithms in existence, only SSDEEP and sdhash are widely used. This paper describes several viable fuzzy hashes not in wide use and compares them in detail, examining both security and non-security flaws. Finally, we develop guidelines to put these hashes to practical use, as well as suggesting improvements to several of the hashes.","PeriodicalId":91384,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Southeast Regional Conference","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Southeast Regional Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3077286.3077289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Fuzzy hashes are gaining recognition in the realm of digital forensics as an alternative method of recognizing similar or nearly identical files. However, despite a high diversity of algorithms in existence, only SSDEEP and sdhash are widely used. This paper describes several viable fuzzy hashes not in wide use and compares them in detail, examining both security and non-security flaws. Finally, we develop guidelines to put these hashes to practical use, as well as suggesting improvements to several of the hashes.
模糊哈希的比较:评价、指南和未来建议
模糊哈希作为一种识别相似或几乎相同文件的替代方法,在数字取证领域得到了认可。然而,尽管存在各种各样的算法,但只有SSDEEP和sdhash被广泛使用。本文描述了几种可行的但尚未被广泛使用的模糊哈希算法,并对它们进行了详细的比较,分析了安全性和非安全性缺陷。最后,我们制定了将这些散列用于实际使用的指导方针,并对其中一些散列提出了改进建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书