{"title":"Case for Sign Bilingualism in Irish Deaf Education","authors":"Noel P. O’Connell","doi":"10.35903/teanga.v28i.1275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sign bilingual education, for the purpose of this article, is defined as a program at primary or secondary school where sign language is used as the first language of instruction with spoken/written language (e.g. English) as the second language (Knoors et al., 2014). International research on sign bilingual education has been on the rise over the last twenty years to the extent that researchers can no longer ignore its importance in an Irish context. The aim of this article is to establish whether or not a case should be made for sign bilingual education in Ireland. Based on a review of international literature, the article begins by discussing the historical development of sign bilingualism. It then discusses each of the key objectives for such a programme outlined in Marschark et al. (2014): (1) the promotion of first (sign) language acquisition to support literacy and numeracy skills in the second (spoken) language; (2) to use an accessible, visual language as a way to unlock the curriculum for deaf students; (3) to improve proficiency in the written and spoken language of the majority population; (4) to enhance deaf children’s social, emotional and positive identity development and their academic achievement. The study concludes with the argument that, although empirical evidence is limited, there are sufficient grounds for promoting a debate on sign bilingual education at policy level in Ireland. ","PeriodicalId":36036,"journal":{"name":"Teanga","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teanga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35903/teanga.v28i.1275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sign bilingual education, for the purpose of this article, is defined as a program at primary or secondary school where sign language is used as the first language of instruction with spoken/written language (e.g. English) as the second language (Knoors et al., 2014). International research on sign bilingual education has been on the rise over the last twenty years to the extent that researchers can no longer ignore its importance in an Irish context. The aim of this article is to establish whether or not a case should be made for sign bilingual education in Ireland. Based on a review of international literature, the article begins by discussing the historical development of sign bilingualism. It then discusses each of the key objectives for such a programme outlined in Marschark et al. (2014): (1) the promotion of first (sign) language acquisition to support literacy and numeracy skills in the second (spoken) language; (2) to use an accessible, visual language as a way to unlock the curriculum for deaf students; (3) to improve proficiency in the written and spoken language of the majority population; (4) to enhance deaf children’s social, emotional and positive identity development and their academic achievement. The study concludes with the argument that, although empirical evidence is limited, there are sufficient grounds for promoting a debate on sign bilingual education at policy level in Ireland.
就本文而言,手语双语教育被定义为小学或中学的一种课程,其中手语作为第一语言,口语/书面语(例如英语)作为第二语言(Knoors et al., 2014)。在过去的二十年里,国际上对手语双语教育的研究一直在上升,以至于研究者不能再忽视它在爱尔兰语境中的重要性。本文的目的是确定是否应该为爱尔兰的手语双语教育提出一个案例。在回顾国际文献的基础上,本文首先讨论了符号双语的历史发展。然后讨论了Marschark等人(2014)概述的该计划的每个关键目标:(1)促进第一语言(手语)习得,以支持第二语言(口语)的读写和计算技能;(2)使用无障碍的视觉语言,为聋哑学生解锁课程;(三)提高多数人口的文字和口语水平;(4)促进聋儿社会认同、情感认同和积极认同的发展及学业成就。该研究的结论是,尽管经验证据有限,但有足够的理由在爱尔兰的政策层面上促进关于手语双语教育的辩论。