Reliability of the pre-operative imaging to assess neck nodal involvement in oral cancer patients, a single-center study

Antti L Pakkanen, E. Marttila, S. Apajalahti, J. Snäll, T. Wilkman
{"title":"Reliability of the pre-operative imaging to assess neck nodal involvement in oral cancer patients, a single-center study","authors":"Antti L Pakkanen, E. Marttila, S. Apajalahti, J. Snäll, T. Wilkman","doi":"10.4317/medoral.25228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Primary sites for the metastasis of oral cancer are the cervical lymph nodes. Although there has been considerable technical advancement in the radiological imaging, capability to recognize all metastatic lymph nodes pre-operatively has remained as a challenge. Thus elective neck dissection (END) has remained as reliable practice to treat cervical lymph nodes. This study evaluated the accuracy of pre-operative imaging in pre-operative diagnostics of cervical lymph node status using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We have also considered the reasons for the difficulties to recognise metastatic nodes in cervical area. Material and Methods Patient charts of patients who had had elective neck dissection as a treatment for primary OSCC in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital between 2016 and 2017 were assessed retrospectively. The outcome variable was post-operatively histologically confirmed lymph node metastasis in the neck area. The primary predictor variable was radiologically confirmed metastasis in the neck area. The explanatory variables were age, sex, pT-class, imaging modality, delay and location of the tumour. Descriptive statistics, sensitivity, specificity and Youden-J index were computed. Results Eighty-three patients were included in the study. The sensitivity to detect pathological lymph nodes was 44.8%, and the specificity for the examination was 87.0%. 19.3% of cN0 patients had metastasis in the cervical nodes, whereas of the cN+ patients 8.4% were actually pN0. Patients having cN0, the largest neck metastasis was over 10 mm in 12.5%, whereas cN1-3 patients the corresponding rate was 45.5%. The computational threshold to diagnose a metastatic node was 7 mm. Conclusions Especially small metastases are difficult to diagnose. Limitations of radiological diagnostics must be considered when treating OSCC. Key words:Oral cancer, Metastasis, CT, MRI, Neck dissection.","PeriodicalId":18367,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","volume":"46 1","pages":"e191 - e197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background Primary sites for the metastasis of oral cancer are the cervical lymph nodes. Although there has been considerable technical advancement in the radiological imaging, capability to recognize all metastatic lymph nodes pre-operatively has remained as a challenge. Thus elective neck dissection (END) has remained as reliable practice to treat cervical lymph nodes. This study evaluated the accuracy of pre-operative imaging in pre-operative diagnostics of cervical lymph node status using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We have also considered the reasons for the difficulties to recognise metastatic nodes in cervical area. Material and Methods Patient charts of patients who had had elective neck dissection as a treatment for primary OSCC in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital between 2016 and 2017 were assessed retrospectively. The outcome variable was post-operatively histologically confirmed lymph node metastasis in the neck area. The primary predictor variable was radiologically confirmed metastasis in the neck area. The explanatory variables were age, sex, pT-class, imaging modality, delay and location of the tumour. Descriptive statistics, sensitivity, specificity and Youden-J index were computed. Results Eighty-three patients were included in the study. The sensitivity to detect pathological lymph nodes was 44.8%, and the specificity for the examination was 87.0%. 19.3% of cN0 patients had metastasis in the cervical nodes, whereas of the cN+ patients 8.4% were actually pN0. Patients having cN0, the largest neck metastasis was over 10 mm in 12.5%, whereas cN1-3 patients the corresponding rate was 45.5%. The computational threshold to diagnose a metastatic node was 7 mm. Conclusions Especially small metastases are difficult to diagnose. Limitations of radiological diagnostics must be considered when treating OSCC. Key words:Oral cancer, Metastasis, CT, MRI, Neck dissection.
术前影像学评估口腔癌患者颈部淋巴结受累的可靠性,一项单中心研究
口腔癌转移的原发部位是颈部淋巴结。尽管放射成像技术已经取得了相当大的进步,但术前识别所有转移性淋巴结的能力仍然是一个挑战。因此,选择性颈部清扫术(END)仍然是治疗颈部淋巴结的可靠方法。本研究评估术前影像学在口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者术前使用计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像诊断颈部淋巴结状态的准确性。我们也考虑了难以识别宫颈转移淋巴结的原因。材料与方法回顾性分析2016 - 2017年赫尔辛基大学医院口腔颌面外科择期颈部清扫术治疗原发性OSCC的患者资料。结果变量为术后组织学证实的颈部淋巴结转移。主要预测变量是放射学证实的颈部转移。解释变量为年龄、性别、ct分级、成像方式、肿瘤的延迟和位置。计算描述性统计、敏感性、特异性和Youden-J指数。结果83例患者纳入研究。检查病理淋巴结的敏感性为44.8%,特异性为87.0%。cN0患者中有19.3%发生宫颈淋巴结转移,而cN+患者中有8.4%发生pN0。cN0患者中,最大颈部转移超过10 mm的占12.5%,而cN1-3患者的相应比例为45.5%。诊断转移淋巴结的计算阈值为7mm。结论尤其是小转移灶难以诊断。在治疗OSCC时必须考虑放射诊断的局限性。关键词:口腔癌,转移,CT, MRI,颈部清扫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信