Development of a model for predicting mussel weight: a comparison of traditional and artificial intelligent methods

IF 1 Q4 FISHERIES
K. I. Uba
{"title":"Development of a model for predicting mussel weight: a comparison of traditional and artificial intelligent methods","authors":"K. I. Uba","doi":"10.17017/j.fish.223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between length and weight is non-linear. Predictive modelling using linear regression methods subjects these variables to transformation which results in models of poor predictive value. Hence, a comparative study on developing a predictive model using traditional (length-weight relationship, LWR; multiple linear regression, MLR) and artificial intelligent (artificial neural networks, ANN) methods was conducted. Specimens (n = 320) of the horse mussel Modiolus modulaides were randomly collected from October 2018 to March 2019 at the coastal area of Dumangas, Iloilo, Philippines. Shell length, shell width and shell height were used as predictor variables for total weight. A multi-layer perceptron architecture model was used and the values were determined by the ANNs model using the actual data. In addition, LWR and MLR models were generated from the same data after log-transformation. The results indicated superiority of the ANN model to predict mussel weight to traditional LWR and MLR models. The ANNs model had the highest correlation coefficient and lowest errors among the predictive models. The ANNs model generated from this study can be a good alternative to existing models and may be useful in sustainable fisheries management.","PeriodicalId":55944,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fisheries","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17017/j.fish.223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between length and weight is non-linear. Predictive modelling using linear regression methods subjects these variables to transformation which results in models of poor predictive value. Hence, a comparative study on developing a predictive model using traditional (length-weight relationship, LWR; multiple linear regression, MLR) and artificial intelligent (artificial neural networks, ANN) methods was conducted. Specimens (n = 320) of the horse mussel Modiolus modulaides were randomly collected from October 2018 to March 2019 at the coastal area of Dumangas, Iloilo, Philippines. Shell length, shell width and shell height were used as predictor variables for total weight. A multi-layer perceptron architecture model was used and the values were determined by the ANNs model using the actual data. In addition, LWR and MLR models were generated from the same data after log-transformation. The results indicated superiority of the ANN model to predict mussel weight to traditional LWR and MLR models. The ANNs model had the highest correlation coefficient and lowest errors among the predictive models. The ANNs model generated from this study can be a good alternative to existing models and may be useful in sustainable fisheries management.
贻贝重量预测模型的发展:传统方法与人工智能方法的比较
长度和重量之间的关系是非线性的。使用线性回归方法的预测建模将这些变量进行转换,从而导致模型的预测价值较差。因此,利用传统的长度-权重关系(LWR)建立预测模型的比较研究;采用多元线性回归(MLR)和人工智能(人工神经网络,ANN)方法。于2018年10月至2019年3月在菲律宾伊洛伊洛州杜曼加斯沿海地区随机采集马贻贝标本320只。以壳长、壳宽和壳高作为总重的预测变量。采用多层感知器结构模型,由人工神经网络模型根据实际数据确定参数值。此外,对同一数据进行对数变换,生成LWR和MLR模型。结果表明,人工神经网络模型对贻贝重量的预测优于传统的LWR和MLR模型。其中,人工神经网络模型的相关系数最高,误差最小。本研究产生的人工神经网络模型可以作为现有模型的一个很好的替代方案,并可能在可持续渔业管理中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信