Computational analysis of nuclear desalination system under various configurations

IF 0.4 4区 工程技术 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Kerntechnik Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.1515/kern-2022-0100
Salah Ud-Din Khan, J. Orfi
{"title":"Computational analysis of nuclear desalination system under various configurations","authors":"Salah Ud-Din Khan, J. Orfi","doi":"10.1515/kern-2022-0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The research addressed the economic evaluation of nuclear energy, coal, oil and natural gas in various cycle configurations with different distillation technologies. A comparison between fossil and nuclear energy sources is discussed. A comprehensive review of all desalination plants using fossil and nuclear energy with cogeneration is also included and discussed. Computational model was used to evaluate nuclear and non-nuclear desalination plants. Four possibilities were discussed. In this first case, a nuclear gas cycle integrated with a MED desalination plant was found to have the lowest cost in the gas cycle. While the nuclear steam cycle integrated with RO has the lowest cost compared to oil and natural gas. In the third case, the combined nuclear cycle was discussed and it was found that the combined nuclear cycle associated with RO has the lowest cost. In the last case, the evaluation of a heat-only desalination plant was conducted among all sources, and it was found that the nuclear plant with RO and MED has the lowest cost. In addition, the completed nuclear desalination plant was subjected to five scenarios to calculate and estimate at which capacity the plant provides the best values. The results show that nuclear desalination with gas cycle is the most economical among the oil and natural gas options.","PeriodicalId":17787,"journal":{"name":"Kerntechnik","volume":"26 1","pages":"291 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kerntechnik","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kern-2022-0100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The research addressed the economic evaluation of nuclear energy, coal, oil and natural gas in various cycle configurations with different distillation technologies. A comparison between fossil and nuclear energy sources is discussed. A comprehensive review of all desalination plants using fossil and nuclear energy with cogeneration is also included and discussed. Computational model was used to evaluate nuclear and non-nuclear desalination plants. Four possibilities were discussed. In this first case, a nuclear gas cycle integrated with a MED desalination plant was found to have the lowest cost in the gas cycle. While the nuclear steam cycle integrated with RO has the lowest cost compared to oil and natural gas. In the third case, the combined nuclear cycle was discussed and it was found that the combined nuclear cycle associated with RO has the lowest cost. In the last case, the evaluation of a heat-only desalination plant was conducted among all sources, and it was found that the nuclear plant with RO and MED has the lowest cost. In addition, the completed nuclear desalination plant was subjected to five scenarios to calculate and estimate at which capacity the plant provides the best values. The results show that nuclear desalination with gas cycle is the most economical among the oil and natural gas options.
核淡化系统在不同配置下的计算分析
摘要研究了核能、煤炭、石油和天然气在不同蒸馏技术下不同循环配置下的经济性评价。讨论了化石能源与核能的比较。对所有使用化石能源和核能热电联产的海水淡化厂也进行了全面的回顾和讨论。采用计算模型对核淡化厂和非核淡化厂进行了评价。讨论了四种可能性。在第一种情况下,发现与MED海水淡化厂相结合的核气体循环在气体循环中成本最低。而与石油和天然气相比,与RO相结合的核蒸汽循环成本最低。在第三种情况下,讨论了联合核循环,发现与RO相关的联合核循环成本最低。在最后一个案例中,我们对一个纯热海水淡化厂进行了评价,结果发现,采用RO和MED的核电站成本最低。此外,对已建成的核海水淡化厂进行了五种情景的计算和估计,以确定该厂在哪种能力下能提供最佳价值。结果表明,在石油和天然气方案中,气循环核脱盐是最经济的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kerntechnik
Kerntechnik 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Kerntechnik is an independent journal for nuclear engineering (including design, operation, safety and economics of nuclear power stations, research reactors and simulators), energy systems, radiation (ionizing radiation in industry, medicine and research) and radiological protection (biological effects of ionizing radiation, the system of protection for occupational, medical and public exposures, the assessment of doses, operational protection and safety programs, management of radioactive wastes, decommissioning and regulatory requirements).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信