Efficacy and Risks of Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review

Q4 Medicine
Anna Luíza Machado Nogueira, Ana Luísa dos Santos Maciel, Amanda Campos Querubino, Roberta Teixeira Prado, Jussara Regina Martins
{"title":"Efficacy and Risks of Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review","authors":"Anna Luíza Machado Nogueira, Ana Luísa dos Santos Maciel, Amanda Campos Querubino, Roberta Teixeira Prado, Jussara Regina Martins","doi":"10.36660/ijcs.20210246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Therapeutic hypothermia is used in adults and neonates after cardiac arrest, but its efficiency in children under 18 years old is still uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and risks of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest in children under 18 years of age through a systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed in January 2022 in the MEDLINE, SciELO, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. Inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed in humans. Articles from other typologies, published more than 10 years ago, or with volunteers over 18 years old were excluded. Results: Four studies were identified, of which 3 were analyzed; all of them were of moderate quality according to the Jadad Scale and the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The studies indicated that lowering the temperature did not improve data on mortality and adverse events. Two studies did not identify statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) considering hypothermia in relation to normothermia in terms of survival, safety, and global neurobehavioral and cognitive function. The other study did not show improved serum biomarker concentrations. Conclusions: The results found in this review do not support the use of therapeutic hypothermia after pediatric cardiac arrest, as this intervention did not provide any apparent benefits in terms of safety, adverse events, survival, and neurological impact. We recommend the conduction of new RCTs using the measurement of serum biomarkers to better evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.","PeriodicalId":32690,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/ijcs.20210246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic hypothermia is used in adults and neonates after cardiac arrest, but its efficiency in children under 18 years old is still uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and risks of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest in children under 18 years of age through a systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed in January 2022 in the MEDLINE, SciELO, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. Inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed in humans. Articles from other typologies, published more than 10 years ago, or with volunteers over 18 years old were excluded. Results: Four studies were identified, of which 3 were analyzed; all of them were of moderate quality according to the Jadad Scale and the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The studies indicated that lowering the temperature did not improve data on mortality and adverse events. Two studies did not identify statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) considering hypothermia in relation to normothermia in terms of survival, safety, and global neurobehavioral and cognitive function. The other study did not show improved serum biomarker concentrations. Conclusions: The results found in this review do not support the use of therapeutic hypothermia after pediatric cardiac arrest, as this intervention did not provide any apparent benefits in terms of safety, adverse events, survival, and neurological impact. We recommend the conduction of new RCTs using the measurement of serum biomarkers to better evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.
儿童心脏骤停后低温治疗的疗效和风险:一项系统综述
背景:治疗性低温用于心脏骤停后的成人和新生儿,但其在18岁以下儿童中的有效性仍不确定。目的:通过系统评价18岁以下儿童心脏骤停后低温治疗的疗效和风险。方法:于2022年1月对MEDLINE、SciELO、Cochrane和LILACS数据库进行系统评价。纳入标准:在人类中进行的随机对照试验(rct)。其他类型的文章,发表时间超过10年,或者志愿者年龄超过18岁,都被排除在外。结果:共发现4项研究,其中3项进行分析;根据Jadad量表和Cochrane协作工具,均为中等质量。研究表明,降低体温并没有改善死亡率和不良事件的数据。考虑到低温与常温在生存、安全性、整体神经行为和认知功能方面的关系,两项研究没有发现统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.05)。另一项研究没有显示血清生物标志物浓度的改善。结论:本综述发现的结果不支持在儿童心脏骤停后使用治疗性低温,因为这种干预在安全性、不良事件、生存率和神经系统影响方面没有提供任何明显的益处。我们建议进行新的随机对照试验,使用血清生物标志物的测量来更好地评估干预的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信