A nomenclatural history for Plectorrhiza purpurata (Orchidaceae)

IF 0.5 4区生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES

Telopea Pub Date : 2019-09-20 DOI:10.7751/telopea13449

Matthew A. M. Renner

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nomenclatural history of the Australian epiphytic orchid Plectorrhiza purpurata (Rupp) M.A.M.Renner is reviewed. The first name published for this species, Cleisostoma gemmatum Rupp, is illegitimate, and Rupp proposed a replacement name, Cleisostoma purpuratum Rupp, shortly thereafter. Though the replacement was somewhat obliquely worded, Rupp fulfilled the requirements of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, such that Cleisostoma purpuratum was available to serve as the basionym for the name generally used for this orchid since 1967, i.e. Schistotylus purpuratus (Rupp) Dockrill. The transfer of this taxon to Plectorrhiza under the new name Plectorrhiza gemmata M.A.Clem., D.L.Jones & D.P.Banks resulted in the publication of a superfluous name, because the earliest legitimate epithet purpurata is available in Plectorrhiza and ought to have been adopted. The required new combination is made.

查看原文本刊更多论文

紫茎兰(兰科)的命名史

综述了澳大利亚附生兰花Plectorrhiza purpurata (Rupp) M.A.M.Renner的命名史。该物种的第一个名字Cleisostoma gemmatum Rupp是非法的，此后不久，Rupp提出了一个替代名称Cleisostoma purpuratum Rupp。虽然这一替换的措辞有些隐晦，但Rupp符合《国际藻类、真菌和植物命名规则》的要求，因此自1967年以来，这种兰花的名称(即Schistotylus purpuratus (Rupp) Dockrill)可以作为Cleisostoma purpuratum的基础名。这个分类群以新名称Plectorrhiza gemmata M.A.Clem转移到plectorrhia。d.l.琼斯和d.p.班克斯的研究结果导致了一个多余的名字的出版，因为最早的合法绰号紫癜出现在《鬼根》中，应该被采纳。所需要的新组合完成了。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Telopea PLANT SCIENCES-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

42.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： Manuscripts submitted for publication in TELOPEA are published online, after peer review and acceptance by the TELOPEA Editorial Committee and when final editorial formatting has been completed. The journal specialises in plant systematics and phylogeny. The geographic scope of the journal encompasses Australia, Malesia, Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia. The suitability of a work for the journal depends on the topic and the region of origin, generally the narrower the focus of the manuscript the closer to New South Wales must be its geographic focus. As a general guide, we will consider: 1) revisionary treatments and other substantial bodies of work from any of the regions mentioned above. 2) new species from any Australian state. 3) new country records for Australia from any state. 4) new state records from New South Wales only. However, we aim to support botanical research across the broader Australasian and Pacific region, and will consider submissions on their merit. Generally we will not consider extraterritorial new country records, or single lectotypification papers unless they pertain to New South Wales taxa, or have significant bearing on the Australian flora.