The post(-)colonial Arab city

IF 2.2 Q2 GEOGRAPHY

SPACE AND POLITY Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI:10.1080/13562576.2020.1787135

E. Laurie, C. Philo

引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research from the 1980s by Ronan Paddison, Allan Findlay and colleagues on ‘the post-colonial city' and ‘the Arab city' is examined. Distinguishing between ‘post-colonial' (as periodization) and ‘postcolonial' (as critique), the paper traces how elements of the latter permeated what Paddison and colleagues claimed about the former. A sensitivity to urban ‘models', histories and geographies beyond the Global North was evident, anticipating subsequent postcolonial moves to engage fully with the possibilities of multiple ‘other' urban trajectories, lives, plans and capacities for change. It is also suggested that, inspired by Janet Abu-Lughod, Paddison and colleagues were working towards a postcolonial ‘comparative urbanism'.

查看原文本刊更多论文

后殖民时期的阿拉伯城市

本文回顾了1980年代罗南·帕迪森、艾伦·芬德利及其同事对“后殖民城市”和“阿拉伯城市”的研究。区分“后殖民”(作为分期)和“后殖民”(作为批判)，论文追溯了后者的元素是如何渗透到帕迪逊及其同事对前者的主张中的。对全球北方以外的城市“模式”、历史和地理的敏感性是显而易见的，预计随后的后殖民运动将充分参与多种“其他”城市轨迹、生活、计划和变革能力的可能性。也有人认为，受Janet Abu-Lughod的启发，Paddison和他的同事们正致力于后殖民时期的“比较城市主义”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

SPACE AND POLITY GEOGRAPHY-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

4.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Space & Polity is a fully refereed scholarly international journal devoted to the theoretical and empirical understanding of the changing relationships between the state, and regional and local forms of governance. The journal provides a forum aimed particularly at bringing together social scientists currently working in a variety of disciplines, including geography, political science, sociology, economics, anthropology and development studies and who have a common interest in the relationships between space, place and politics in less developed as well as the advanced economies.