Análise comparativa do teste de caminhada de seis minutos em crianças e adolescentes saudáveis

E. Aquino, F. A. G. Mourão, R. K. V. Souza, Bráulio M. Glicério, C. Coelho
{"title":"Análise comparativa do teste de caminhada de seis minutos em crianças e adolescentes saudáveis","authors":"E. Aquino, F. A. G. Mourão, R. K. V. Souza, Bráulio M. Glicério, C. Coelho","doi":"10.1590/S1413-35552010000100012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To perform a comparative analysis of the six-minute walk test in healthy children and adolescents in corridors of 30.5m (100 feet) 20m (65.6 feet) in length. METHODS: We evaluated 67 participants (36 boys and 31 girls), aged 7 to 14 years old, from public schools of a city in a metropolitan area. All were submitted to four walking tests, two in each of the corridors. The variables analyzed were: walked distance, work rate, mean blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA for repeated measures and significance level at p<0.05. RESULTS: The comparison between the tests in each corridor and between the best tests in the different corridors did not show significant differences in the blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation. The walked distance was not statistically different in the two tests on each corridor. However, the participants covered greater distances on the 30.5m corridor (p<0.05) compared to the best test between corridors. However, this increase was less than 10%. Regarding the cardiac overload and the work rate, there were no significant differences between the corridors. CONCLUSIONS: There were differences in walked distance between the corridors, however they were less than 10% with no significant changes in the other measured parameters. Therefore, the 20m corridor had a good reproducibility for the population of this study.","PeriodicalId":21195,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","volume":"43 1","pages":"75-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552010000100012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a comparative analysis of the six-minute walk test in healthy children and adolescents in corridors of 30.5m (100 feet) 20m (65.6 feet) in length. METHODS: We evaluated 67 participants (36 boys and 31 girls), aged 7 to 14 years old, from public schools of a city in a metropolitan area. All were submitted to four walking tests, two in each of the corridors. The variables analyzed were: walked distance, work rate, mean blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA for repeated measures and significance level at p<0.05. RESULTS: The comparison between the tests in each corridor and between the best tests in the different corridors did not show significant differences in the blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation. The walked distance was not statistically different in the two tests on each corridor. However, the participants covered greater distances on the 30.5m corridor (p<0.05) compared to the best test between corridors. However, this increase was less than 10%. Regarding the cardiac overload and the work rate, there were no significant differences between the corridors. CONCLUSIONS: There were differences in walked distance between the corridors, however they were less than 10% with no significant changes in the other measured parameters. Therefore, the 20m corridor had a good reproducibility for the population of this study.
健康儿童和青少年六分钟步行试验的比较分析
目的:对健康儿童和青少年在长度为30.5米(100英尺)和20米(65.6英尺)的走廊上进行6分钟步行试验进行比较分析。方法:我们评估了67名参与者(36名男孩和31名女孩),年龄在7至14岁之间,来自一个大都市地区的一个城市的公立学校。所有人都接受了四次步行测试,每个走廊两次。分析的变量包括:步行距离、工作速率、平均血压、心率和血氧饱和度。重复测量采用单因素方差分析,显著性水平p<0.05。结果:各通道试验与各通道最佳试验比较,血压、心率、血氧饱和度无显著差异。在每个走廊的两次测试中,步行距离没有统计学差异。然而,与走廊之间的最佳测试相比,参与者在30.5m走廊上的覆盖距离更长(p<0.05)。然而,这一增幅不到10%。在心脏负荷和工作率方面,各走廊间无显著差异。结论:不同走廊间的步行距离存在差异,但差异小于10%,其他测量参数无显著变化。因此,20m走廊对本研究人群具有良好的再现性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信