Comparative analysis of problem-solving ability among JSS mathematics students using computer-assisted instruction blended with problem-solving approach (CAI-PS) versus traditional teaching approach (TTP) in teaching basic statistics

Telima Adolphus, T. Aderonmu
{"title":"Comparative analysis of problem-solving ability among JSS mathematics students using computer-assisted instruction blended with problem-solving approach (CAI-PS) versus traditional teaching approach (TTP) in teaching basic statistics","authors":"Telima Adolphus, T. Aderonmu","doi":"10.5251/AJSIR.2012.3.2.81.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this research is to demonstrate and discuss the educational implications of using CAI-PS or TTP in enhancing problem solving abilities among JSS 1 Mathematics students. A survey and quasi-experimental design were employed using the likert scale and the t-test respectively. Research question and two null hypothesis were raised at 5% (α = 0.05) level of significance. Data collecting instruments include the mathematics Teachers questionnaire (MTQ), used for the teachers while the Structural Statistics Test (SST) was used for the mathematics students. Result of the study revealed that unavailability of CAI equipments and low level of teachers’ competency in computer usage affects the use of CAI-PS for content delivery .Following the findings of the study, it was recommended amongst others that there should be provision of adequate computers and instructional (teaching) related equipments to facilitate mathematics teaching and learning and compulsory inclusion of computer usage in teaching, for all teacher education programmes.","PeriodicalId":7661,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research","volume":"99 1","pages":"81-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5251/AJSIR.2012.3.2.81.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The focus of this research is to demonstrate and discuss the educational implications of using CAI-PS or TTP in enhancing problem solving abilities among JSS 1 Mathematics students. A survey and quasi-experimental design were employed using the likert scale and the t-test respectively. Research question and two null hypothesis were raised at 5% (α = 0.05) level of significance. Data collecting instruments include the mathematics Teachers questionnaire (MTQ), used for the teachers while the Structural Statistics Test (SST) was used for the mathematics students. Result of the study revealed that unavailability of CAI equipments and low level of teachers’ competency in computer usage affects the use of CAI-PS for content delivery .Following the findings of the study, it was recommended amongst others that there should be provision of adequate computers and instructional (teaching) related equipments to facilitate mathematics teaching and learning and compulsory inclusion of computer usage in teaching, for all teacher education programmes.
采用计算机辅助教学混合问题解决方法(CAI-PS)与传统教学方法(TTP)在基础统计学教学中的问题解决能力比较分析
本研究的重点是展示和讨论使用CAI-PS或TTP在提高jss1数学学生解决问题能力方面的教育意义。采用问卷调查和准实验设计,分别采用likert量表和t检验。在5% (α = 0.05)显著水平上提出研究问题和两个零假设。数据收集工具包括数学教师问卷(MTQ)和数学学生结构统计测试(SST)。研究结果显示,电脑辅助教学设备不足及教师电脑使用能力欠佳,影响了使用电脑辅助教学系统进行教学内容。根据研究结果,我们建议在所有教师教育课程中,应提供足够的电脑及与教学有关的设备,以促进数学教与学,并强制将电脑使用纳入教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信